[Sis-ams] AMS Red Book review
Kevin Gifford
Kevin.Gifford at Colorado.EDU
Thu Aug 2 11:52:34 EDT 2007
Hi Scott -
Your request brings to mind a question I have concerning AMS as we go
forward with the BioNet/AMS integration. As I understand it, CCSDS
Red Books are "technically mature" drafts of Blue Books awaiting
formal technical review.
I know you and Seb talked about possible modifications that may smooth
the integration of BioNet with AMS. If AMS is modified as this activity
goes forward, what impact would this have in regards to the CCSDS AMS
maturation process?
Kevin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Scott Burleigh wrote:
> Hi, AMS fans. I understand perfectly how busy everybody is, but still it
> would be good if we could at least get a start on resolving the Red Book
> review RIDs before we get to the meeting in Germany. Has anybody had a
> chance to look through this stuff?
>
> Scott
>
> Scott Burleigh wrote:
>> Hi. The formal Agency review of the first AMS Red Book concluded about a
>> month ago, and I have finally gotten Dispositions prepared for all 76 RIDs
>> received during that review. I have posted the RIDs with dispositions to
>> the AMS CWE
>> page(http://cwe.ccsds.org/sis/docs/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2fsis%2fdocs%2fSIS%2dAMS%2fDraft%20Documents%2fAMS&FolderCTID=&View=%7b390C4ADA%2dA69B%2d4E52%2dA0DA%2d50C48F989C4B%7d).
>>
>> Several of the RIDs were concerned with the number of messages that are
>> exchanged during AMS node registration. To explain why I didn't accept
>> these RIDs, I've drafted a brief white paper examining in detail the
>> current node registration procedure and the proposed alternative. This
>> white paper ("too many messages.pdf") is also posted to that same CWE page.
>>
>> Let's discuss these topics over the next few weeks and try to reach
>> concurrence on as many of the RIDs as possible before the Darmstadt working
>> group meeting in October.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sis-ams mailing list
> Sis-ams at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sis-ams
>
More information about the Sis-ams
mailing list