[Sis-ams] AMS Red Book review

[Scott Burleigh]

Hi, AMS fans.  I understand perfectly how busy everybody is, but still 
it would be good if we could at least get a start on resolving the Red 
Book review RIDs before we get to the meeting in Germany.  Has anybody 
had a chance to look through this stuff?

Scott

Scott Burleigh wrote:
> Hi.  The formal Agency review of the first AMS Red Book concluded 
> about a month ago, and I have finally gotten Dispositions prepared for 
> all 76 RIDs received during that review.  I have posted the RIDs with 
> dispositions to the AMS CWE 
> page(http://cwe.ccsds.org/sis/docs/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2fsis%2fdocs%2fSIS%2dAMS%2fDraft%20Documents%2fAMS&FolderCTID=&View=%7b390C4ADA%2dA69B%2d4E52%2dA0DA%2d50C48F989C4B%7d). 
>
>
> Several of the RIDs were concerned with the number of messages that 
> are exchanged during AMS node registration.  To explain why I didn't 
> accept these RIDs, I've drafted a brief white paper examining in 
> detail the current node registration procedure and the proposed 
> alternative.  This white paper ("too many messages.pdf") is also 
> posted to that same CWE page.
>
> Let's discuss these topics over the next few weeks and try to reach 
> concurrence on as many of the RIDs as possible before the Darmstadt 
> working group meeting in October.