[Sea-sa] 回复: Notes from 9 Feb 17 SAWG Telecon

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Dear Yonghui, and the rest of the SAWG,

I carefully setup the meeting, scheduled the telecon, and then forgot to send out the announcement to all of you.  Just realized that now.

I hope you can all still join the meeting.

Apologies, Peter


From: Yonghui Huang <huangyonghui at hotmail.com>
Date: Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 5:43 AM
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, SEA-SA <sea-sa at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: 回复: [Sea-sa] Notes from 9 Feb 17 SAWG Telecon

Hi Peter,
I haven't received any information of todays meeting.
Will you pls send it again?
Thanks.

Yonghui


-------- 原始邮件 --------
主题：[Sea-sa] Notes from 9 Feb 17 SAWG Telecon
发件人："Shames, Peter M (312B)"
收件人：SEA-SA
抄送：


SAWG Telecon – 9 Feb17

Attendees: Ray Krosley, Eduardo Bergamini, Roger Thompson, Lyu Liangqing, Huang Yonghui, Peter Shames

Discuss issues with proposed Green Book outline

Sec 1, no issues identified
Sec 2, proposed:

1.      Removing Sec 2.7, focus for this document / applications layer is on Functions, not Nodes

2.      Will retain the ABA, SSI distinctions, and also the protocols, patterns, nodes from the SCCS-ADD

3.      Will need to describe distinctions among user nodes, not just EUN, introduce meaningful neutral terms like Mission Operations Node (MON), Science Operations Node (SON), Data Archive Node (DAN).  These are intended to be meaningful in terms of motivating various allocations of functions.

4.      Revise Sec 2.9, Assumptions.  Consider use of DoT everywhere.  Do not re-invent the wheel, consider tailoring vs developing new standards.  Consider how to layer upon various frameworks like Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and how to interface to other CCSDS standards instead of trying to replace them.
Sec 3, proposed:

1.      Retain the SSI / ABA distinctions, but also

2.      Clarify that we already use internetworking (specifically TCP/IP) on the ground

3.      Introduce the concept of delay tolerant / delay aware applications, this is an important aspect
Sec 4, proposed:

1.      PS to provide the security sub-sections as needed
Sec 5, proposed:

1.      Contact Richard Melvin to see how he is doing with his EDS vs MAL evaluation

Action items:

·         RT to draft revisions to Sec 2 & 3 outlines

·         PS to contact Melvin and Cooper @ EDS evaluation

Next Telecons:

1.      23 Feb 2017, see meeting announcement with Webex info

2.      9 March 2017

3.      23 Mar 2017

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sea-sa/attachments/20170223/6b4765e3/attachment.html>