[Moims-sc] FW: CESG-P-2022-05-001 Approval to release CCSDS 521.0-P-2.1, Mission Operations Message Abstraction Layer (Pink Book, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[Mehran Sarkarati]

Dear all,

Attached you will find the comments of Peter on the MAL book, which has been blocked by Peter from going to the agency review.

I will call for a splinter meeting to review the comments and preparing their resolution.

Regards
Mehran



On 10/06/22, 00:22, "CCSDS Secretariat" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote:

    Dear Document Rapporteur,

    The CESG poll to approve release of CCSDS 521.0-P-2.1, Mission
    Operations Message Abstraction Layer (Pink Book, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS
    Agency review concluded with conditions. Please negotiate disposition
    of the conditions directly with the AD(s) who voted to approve with
    conditions and CC the Secretariat on all related correspondence.


    CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2022-05-001 Approval to release CCSDS
    521.0-P-2.1, Mission Operations Message Abstraction Layer (Pink Book,
    Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review
    Results of CESG poll beginning 25 May 2022 and ending 8 June 2022:

                     Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%)
    (Merri, Duhaze, Aguilar Sanchez, Wilmot)
    Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Shames)
    Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
    CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

         Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):   I read through sec 3.5
    and found issues on almost every page.  The marked up version is
    attached.  I think that there are too many vague and inconsistent
    items in this spec to release it for agency review without a thorough scrub.

         Jonathan Wilmot (Approve Unconditionally):  My preference is to
    not hold up the agency review process, but I do agree with the SEA
    AD. The document seems incomplete with many details unspecified. For
    example, "TRANSACTION_TIMEOUT" is a possible error. How would that
    duration time be determined as it is very dependent on the specific
    transport and network latency. The same MAL could not be used for
    TCP/IP and DTN which limits the value of message abstraction.

    Total Respondents:  5

    No response was received from the following Area(s):

         CSS
         SIS



    SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
    PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after
    conditions have been addressed

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 521x0p20_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 2130926 bytes
Desc: 521x0p20_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20220610/c2689741/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 521x0p20_CESG_Approval.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 1853440 bytes
Desc: 521x0p20_CESG_Approval.doc
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20220610/c2689741/attachment-0001.doc>