[Moims-ipr] Re: [Moims-dai] [Fwd: ISO Systematic Review of CCSDS Document 651.0-B-1 (ISO 20652:2006 - Producer-archive interface - Methodology abstract standard)]

[John Garrett]

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the information.

I think it is reasonable to follow the ISO procedures. 
We just didn't know about the change so we didn't have a chance to 
discuss it when we were all together at the International Workshop

Cheers,
-JOhn


Allan, PM (Peter) wrote:
> John,
>
> ISO changed its procedures so that the first review happens after 3
> years, followed by 5 yearly reviews. The CCSDS management council agreed
> to go along with this as to do otherwise would be incredibly messy.
>
> It seems that this change has not been fully passed on to those who need
> to know.
>
> Peter Allan
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> Dr. Peter M. Allan 
> Head, Space Data Division 
> Space Science and Technology Department 
> Science and Technology Facilities Council 
> Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 
> Harwell Science and Innovation Campus 
> Didcot 
> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX 
> England 
> e-mail: peter.allan at stfc.ac.uk 
> Tel: +44 (1235) 445723     fax: +44 (1235) 446667 
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
> [mailto:moims-dai-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of John Garrett
> Sent: 27 May 2009 20:42
> To: MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion; MOIMS-Information Packaging
> &Registries; MOIMS Repository Audit &Certification
> Subject: [Moims-dai] [Fwd: ISO Systematic Review of CCSDS Document
> 651.0-B-1 (ISO 20652:2006 - Producer-archive interface - Methodology
> abstract standard)]
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've been asked to reconfirm the PAIMAS standard.
> Please let me know if you think it should be reconfirmed.
> I think it should be and I intend to submit the paperwork to reconfirm
> it next week unless I hear objections.
> Normally we would discuss this at the International Workshop, but this
> just came in.  I don't understand why reconfirmation is necessary since
> it should be every 5 years and it has only been 3 as the ISO date
> indicates.  (ISO 20652:2006).
> I've asked CCSDS Secretariat to check why we are getting these on 3 year
> cycle, but we may not get any explanation back before the due date.
>
> Cheers,
> -JOhn
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	ISO Systematic Review of CCSDS Document 651.0-B-1 (ISO 
> 20652:2006 - Producer-archive interface - Methodology abstract standard)
> Date: 	Wed, 27 May 2009 13:45:26 -0500
> From: 	Craig Day <CraigD at aiaa.org>
> To: 	Garrett, John G. (GSFC-690.1)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] 
> <john.g.garrett at nasa.gov>
> CC: 	Hooke, Adrian J. (HQ-CG000)[JPL] <adrian.j.hooke at nasa.gov>
>
>
>
> John,
>
>  
>
> The subject ISO document based on the CCSDS book is up for its periodic
> review. You are listed as the NASA Rappoteur for the responsible working
> group, is that correct? If so, can you please help us to prepare the
> U.S. position on this review so that we can submit a vote. This action
> is due back to ANSI by 15 June. Can you please review the attached
> ballot form and let me know if you are the right person to complete it?
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
>  
>
> --
>
> Craig Day
> U.S. TAG Administrator, ISO TC20/SC13
> American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
> 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500
> Reston, VA 20191-4344
> 703-264-3849
> craigd at aiaa.org <mailto:craigd at aiaa.org>
>
>  
>
>