[Moims-ipr] [Fwd: Re: Fwd: EAST pink sheets RIDS]

[Boucon Daniele]

 Hello John,

 I've transferred the message to Denis.

 Cheers,

 Daniele

-----Message d'origine-----
De : moims-ipr-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:moims-ipr-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de John Garrett
Envoyé : mardi 24 février 2009 19:15
À : MOIMS-Data Archive Ingestion; MOIMS-Information Packaging & Registries; Thomas Gannett; A.BRINKER Elisabeth
Objet : [Moims-ipr] [Fwd: Re: Fwd: EAST pink sheets RIDS]


Hi All,

Attached are copies of the EAST updates.
These updates were originated I believe by CNES a long time ago and the 
updates were agreed at that time.
Since then through various CCSDS Editors, CCSDS Reorgs, etc., these 
updates apparantly never received the final blessing.
Tom Gannett has now provided the pink pages in the current CCSDS 
publication format.

Would everyone please review these and let me know if you approve these 
for publication or if there is any problem.
Since this is only a few pages, please review these by next week and 
send me your response.
If I do not see any negative responses, I will ask Nestor to send a 
resolution through CESG and CMC to publish these
pink sheets as part of a new EAST Blue Book Issue 3.

Cheers,
-JOhn





-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Fwd: EAST pink sheets RIDS
Date: 	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:01:42 -0400
From: 	Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org>
To: 	John Garrett <John.G.Garrett at nasa.gov>
References: 	<6.2.1.2.2.20080918140029.042000e0 at mail630.gsfc.nasa.gov>



John:

The EAST book as modified by known RIDs is attached.

GSFC RID #3 proposed modification of text that was also modified by 
an INPE RID (third in attached file).  Where the two RIDs were in 
conflict, I applied the disposition of the INPE comment.  You should 
verify reference to example 3-13 rather than 3-12 is OK.

I got a copy of the INPE dispositions only because Eduardo CCed the 
Secretariat when he sent the RIDs to the review coordinator.

Concerning the other Agencies, I found a late response from Jean-Marc 
that there were no CNES RIDs.  ESA and JAXA also reported they had no RIDs.

If we go with the assumption that it is improbable any of the other 
Agencies would have had RIDs, the only thing needed to start the 
approval process for issue 3 is a resolution from Nestor.

TG

At 02:02 PM 9/18/2008, John Garrett wrote:

> >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
> >        mail630.gsfc.nasa.gov
> >X-Spam-Level:
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
> >        DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
> >X-Sender: bbrinker at pop500.gsfc.nasa.gov
> >Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:51:02 -0400
> >To: Donald.M.Sawyer at nasa.gov
> >From: Elisabeth Brinker <Elisabeth.A.Brinker at nasa.gov>
> >Subject: EAST pink sheets RIDS
> >Cc: John.Garrett at gsfc.nasa.gov, lreich at csc.com
> >
> >Don,
> >I've attached five RIDS for the EAST pink sheets since these are
> due by today.
> >
> >   Betty
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org>
+1 443 472 0805