[Moims-ipr] I am worried because IPR / DAI are in danger to be killed

[Don Sawyer]

Nestor,

We discussed it at the recent GSFC standards review and the utility  
of MOIMS DAI and IPR was recognized and supported.  Clarification on  
the sources of funding was the only issue.  We'll have it officially  
settled prior to the June 25th meeting in Brussels.

ciao,

don

On May 3, 2007, at 3:23 AM, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int wrote:

>
> Don and Lou,
>
> OK. I believe the work of DAI / IPR should be more visible outside  
> the WGs
> and MOIMS.
>
> There will be an intermediate MC meeting on 25th / 26th June at  
> Brussels. I
> would like to receive prior to that meeting some conclusions about  
> NASA
> position (GSFC, JPL and Mike Kearney) wrt DAI / IPR future.
> ciao
> nestor
>
>
>
>
>              Don Sawyer
>              <Donald.M.Sawyer at n
>               
> asa.gov>                                                     To
>              Sent by:                   "MOIMS-Information  
> Packaging &amp;
>              moims-ipr-bounces@         Registries"
>              mailman.ccsds.org          <moims-ipr at mailman.ccsds.org>
>                                                                        
>     cc
>
>              02/05/2007  
> 19:09                                        Subject
>                                         Re: [Moims-ipr] I am  
> worried because
>                                         IPR / DAI are in danger to be
>              Please respond to          killed
>              "MOIMS-Information
>               Packaging &amp;
>                 Registries"
>              <moims-ipr at mailman
>                 .ccsds.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nestor,
>
> Actually, in DAI there has been a lot of work but it has not been
> visible on the DAI list.  We need to correct this.  One factor is
> that Daniele was on vacation for several weeks during which time NASA
> was taking the lead and generated a lot of material.  Now that
> Daniele is back she is taking the lead.  We'll get the latest
> material out on the DAI list.
>
> I'll let Lou respond for IPR.
>
> There should be no issue with regard to killing DAI or IPR due to
> lack of NASA participation.  NASA has funding that was not
> appreciated by the NASA CMC representative and thus i believe it lead
> to your concern.
>
> That said, there is always the possibility for new chair persons.
>
> cheers-
> don
>
> On May 2, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am a little bit worried for the inaction of the WGs since
>> Colorado Springs.
>>
>> When I compare the activity done in NAV and SM&C WGs (5 to 7
>> telecons since
>> Jan 2007), your activity has been very low.
>>
>> In order to have some political movements, I need to know the NASA
>> GSFC
>> position.
>>
>> One of the possibilities could be to take the chairmanship of IPR /
>> DAI by
>> the Europeans and increase our resources. This can avoid the
>> disolution of
>> both groups.
>>
>> I would appreciate your feedback asap.
>>
>> ciao
>> nestor
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moims-ipr mailing list
>> Moims-ipr at mailman.ccsds.org
>> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-ipr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moims-ipr mailing list
> Moims-ipr at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-ipr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moims-ipr mailing list
> Moims-ipr at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-ipr