[Moims-ipr] Re: [CESG] Reaffirmation Resolution
moims-ipr@mailman.ccsds.org
moims-ipr@mailman.ccsds.org
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:55:29 +0100
Dear all,
I need Chairman feedback asap
Adrian is suggesting 1 year re-affirmation
Your views please
ciao
nestor
----- Forwarded by Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA on 14/10/2003 19:51 -----
|--------+----------------------------->
| | "Adrian J. Hooke" |
| | <adrian.j.hooke@jpl|
| | .nasa.gov> |
| | Sent by: |
| | cesg-admin@mailman.|
| | ccsds.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 13/10/2003 16:29 |
| | |
|--------+----------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - ADs" |
| <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org> |
| cc: |
| Subject: Re: [CESG] Reaffirmation Resolution |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
At 07:43 AM 10/13/2003, Nestor.Peccia@esa.int wrote:
We have discussed in MOIMS the issue of reaffirmation during a shorter
time, but nobody could tell us if this is addressed in the Procedures.
Nestor: the current (Spring 2003) Procedures Manual can be accessed at:
http://www.ccsds.org/docu/dscgi/ds.py/View/Collection-371
The re-affirmation procedures are in Section 6.1.4, pages 6-4/5. The procedures
say that the CESG must reconfirm a document but they do *not* say that the
reconfirmation has to be for a 5-year period. In fact, a precedent for six-month
and one-year reaffirmations has been established in the past (several P2 books
and the AOS Blue Books had such re-affirmations).
In this case, as I noted on Friday, I would strongly urge that the MOIMS Area
should seek a re-affirmation period that only covers the time necessary to
thoroughly review the documents in light of current requirements and technology.
A one-year extension (maximum) would seem appropriate.
Best regards
Adrian