[Moims-dai] Review site

[David Giaretta]

The review site, http://review.oais.info is back up. Please let me know if there are any problems.

 

The open issues are in the table below. Note that ID 48 corresponds to http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=48 

 


ID

Product

Summary

Explanation of the reason for the suggested change


48

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities

The second mandatory responsibility, “Obtain sufficient control of the information”, is mentioned twice in the metrics, as the focus of metric 4.1.6 and as supporting text for metric 3.5.1.1. However an assessment of the metrics found that this responsibility had the second highest number of supporting metrics. Is there some way to make this fact more clear and to align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities described on the OAIS Framework? [1]

[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016.  http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/


49

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Revise or update language in metrics  to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements

Generally, revise or update language in metrics, including explanation, discussion, and examples for selected metrics to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements in data management practices, including any revisions that will be made to the Mandatory Responsibilities and other areas described within the CCSDS OAIS Framework, the CCSDS DAI draft on Information Preparation for Long-Term Use, practices recommended in the Group on Earth Observations’ Data Management Principles and Implementation Guidelines, recommendations in the Research Data Alliance’s Data Management Trends, Principles and Components – What Needs to be Done Next?, the Global Climate Observing System’s current revisions to the Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC, Common Framework for Earth Observation Data, DSA–WDS Core Certification and its Catalogue of Common Requirements, FAIR Principles, and the Belmont Forum E­Infrastructure and Data Management: Implementation Plan. [1]

[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016.  http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/


44

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Identifiers - Submetrics (4.2.4.1.x) – Can the five metrics be combined?

These submetrics seem to be much more detailed than most submetrics.


45

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Identifying and managing risks - Submetrics (5.1.1.1.x) - Can the eight metrics be reduced to two?

These submetrics seem to be much more detailed than most submetrics.


119

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Changes to ensure updated ISO 16363 is consistent with updated OAIS

This is a catch-all comment to ensure that this standard is consistent with OAIS (ISO 14721).


251

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

5.1.1 Delete unmatched closing paren

Editorial


258

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Restate 4.2.1 criteria

Simplifies criteria.

By definition all AIPs are to be preserved by the repository, so we don't need to include that in the criteria.


260

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Switch 4.2.1.1 and 4.2.1.2

Makes more sense to talk about the AIP description before saying that an AIP needs to be linked to that description


259

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

4.2.1 Definition of AIP does not help to find the AIP

Definition of AIP does not help to find the AIP


262

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

4.2.1.2 Rewrite Supporting Text

AIP descriptions do not alone provide all the services (or possibly any of the services) mentioned in the supporting text.


247

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.3.1 and 3.3.2 Address issue of "general public" as part of Designated Community

Many archives have general public as customers, but there can be problems if they are included in Designated Community.


248

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.3.2.1 Add discussion of staff needs

Staff knowledge is an important element for adopting and enforcing policies.


249

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.3.4 Transparency vs. other needs

For many criteria, there is often not a single concern, but there is a need for balance between competing requirements.


250

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.5.1 and 3.5.1.1 Add evidence of legislation as example of way to meet criteria

Many archives preserve data because they are legally required to do so.


254

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

5.1.1.1.4 Seems to require blank check for hardware updates

Blank checks for updates are not feasible.


256

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

5.1.1.1.8 Seems to require blank check for software updates

Unrealistic to expect committed funding for any future software updates.


244

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.1.2.1 Questions to address

These questions may arise in some audits


261

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

4.2.1.2 Allow descriptions for class of AIPs

The same definition should be adequate for a whole class of AIPs.

The definition should deal with all components of that AIP whether they are required components or not.


245

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.1.2.2 Questions to address

Questions that could arise in some audits.


246

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

3.2.1.3 Add to Examples of Evidence

Provides additional examples of how to meet criteria


252

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

5.1.1 Scaling largest systems will likely result in major disruptions

Ensure we are clear what is required and how it relates to determining risks.


253

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

How do 5.1.1.1.2 and 5.1.1.1.3 differ?

Seems to be a lot of overlap.  Not sure criteria are properly stated.


255

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

How do 5.1.1.1.6 and 5.1.1.1.7 differ?

Perhaps these should be collapsed or perhaps rewritten to more clearly indicate the distinct focus.


257

Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Add sub-metrics to 4.2.3

Seems like several sub-metrics could be added.  If not, then metric and sub-metric could be combined.


264

OAIS June 2012

Definitions such as Information Package refer to Content Information - should actually refer to Information Object

This is needed for conceptual consistency since, for example, any Information Package may contain any Information Object.


263

OAIS June 2012

Placeholder for changes made following suggestions from MOIMS ADA

Some text changes have been made to accomodate the comments from MOIMS ADA


241

OAIS June 2012

Add a clarification to section 3.2.6 about Make the Information Available

The mandatory responsibility states

"Make the preserved information available to the Designated Community and enable the information to be disseminated as copies of, or as traceable to, the original submitted Content Information with evidence supporting its Authenticity."

The additional paragraph proposed simply adds some examples about how the "as traceable to, the original submitted Content Information with evidence supporting its Authenticity" is carried out.


242

Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification

Only need one person on-site for Surveillance audits

Requiring two auditors would be an unnecessary expense for the client.


239

Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification

Add information about audit time to section 9.1.4

Need to add specific guidance related to ISO 16363


243

Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification

Current version of ISO 17021 and applicability of references in CCSDS 652.1-M-2 / ISO 16919

Since CCSDS 652.1-M is heavily dependent on ISO/IEC 17021:2011, mentions of 17021 must be reviewed for correctness with the evolving 16919.  Also, we should establish during the process of editing 652.1-M, which references to 17021-1:2015 are relevant, and which additions to 17021 should be incorporated by reference.

 

The general schedule is

General schedule:


Tuesday of the month

Activity

Technical Editor(s)


1st 

ISO 16363    Audit and Certification Metrics

John Garrett, David Giaretta


2nd

IPELTU Info Preservation Enabling Long-Term Usage

David Giaretta


3rd

OAIS-IF DAADD    OAIS Interoperability Framework – Digital Archive Architecture Design Doc

Steve Hughes


4th

OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks

 


5th 

OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks

 

 

 

..David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20190627/dd19e0c3/attachment-0001.html>