[Moims-dai] Reminder of Skype call today

[David Giaretta]

Meeting: 10:00 Tuesday (EST), 1500 UK time, 1600 Paris time

 

Join it by clicking the link:

https://join.skype.com/ykyu5SIPhSnD

 

*Don't have Skype yet? Download it before you join https://www.skype.com

 

General schedule:


Tuesday of the month

Activity

Technical Editor(s)


1st 

ISO 16363    Audit and Certification Metrics

John Garrett, David Giaretta


2nd

IPELTU Info Preservation Enabling Long-Term Usage

David Giaretta, Roberta Svanetti


3rd

OAIS-IF DAADD    OAIS Interoperability Framework – Digital Archive Architecture Design Doc

Steve Hughes


4th

OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks

 


5th 

OAIS update finalization, Group administration, Planning, new projects, or special issues identified other weeks

 

 

 

Draft agenda this week (1st Tuesday of the month):

1.	We are using http://review.oais.info  to track actions – see http://review.oais.info/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__ <http://review.oais.info/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&list_id=2522&order=Importance&product=ACTIONS&query_format=specific> &list_id=2522&order=Importance&product=ACTIONS&query_format=specific
2.	ISO 16363 – what’s on http://review.oais.info

 


Bug ID

Component

Summary

Explanation of the reason for the suggested change


44 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=44> 

Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Identifiers - Submetrics (4.2.4.1.x) – Can the five metrics be combined?

These submetrics seem to be much more detailed than most submetrics.


48 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=48> 

Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities

The second mandatory responsibility, “Obtain sufficient control of the information”, is mentioned twice in the metrics, as the focus of metric 4.1.6 and as supporting text for metric 3.5.1.1. However an assessment of the metrics found that this responsibility had the second highest number of supporting metrics. Is there some way to make this fact more clear and to align the ISO 16363 metrics more closely with the Mandatory Responsibilities described on the OAIS Framework? [1]



[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016.  http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/


49 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=49> 

Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Revise or update language in metrics  to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements

Generally, revise or update language in metrics, including explanation, discussion, and examples for selected metrics to reflect current capabilities and recent improvements in data management practices, including any revisions that will be made to the Mandatory Responsibilities and other areas described within the CCSDS OAIS Framework, the CCSDS DAI draft on Information Preparation for Long-Term Use, practices recommended in the Group on Earth Observations’ Data Management Principles and Implementation Guidelines, recommendations in the Research Data Alliance’s Data Management Trends, Principles and Components – What Needs to be Done Next?, the Global Climate Observing System’s current revisions to the Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC, Common Framework for Earth Observation Data, DSA–WDS Core Certification and its Catalogue of Common Requirements, FAIR Principles, and the Belmont Forum E­Infrastructure and Data Management: Implementation Plan. [1]



[1] Hughes, JS, Downs RR. 2016. Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment. SciataCon 2016, Denver, CO 11-13 September 2016.  http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/100/paper/36/


119 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=119> 

Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Changes to ensure updated ISO 16363 is consistent with updated OAIS

This is a catch-all comment to ensure that this standard is consistent with OAIS (ISO 14721).


244 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=244> 

Section 3  : Organisational Infrastructure

3.1.2.1 Questions to address

These questions may arise in some audits


245 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=245> 

Section 3  : Organisational Infrastructure

3.1.2.2 Questions to address

Questions that could arise in some audits.


247 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=247> 

Section 3  : Organisational Infrastructure

3.3.1 and 3.3.2 Address issue of "general public" as part of Designated Community

Many archives have general public as customers, but there can be problems if they are included in Designated Community.



248 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=248>  

	
Section 3  : Organisational Infrastructure

3.3.2.1 Add discussion of staff needs

Staff knowledge is an important element for adopting and enforcing policies.


249 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=249> 

Section 3  : Organisational Infrastructure

3.3.4 Transparency vs. other needs

For many criteria, there is often not a single concern, but there is a need for balance between competing requirements.


252 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=252> 

Section 5  : Infrastructure and security risk management

5.1.1 Scaling largest systems will likely result in major disruptions

Ensure we are clear what is required and how it relates to determining risks.


253 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=253> 

Section 5  : Infrastructure and security risk management

How do 5.1.1.1.2 and 5.1.1.1.3 differ?

Seems to be a lot of overlap.  Not sure criteria are properly stated.


255 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=255> 

Section 5  : Infrastructure and security risk management

How do 5.1.1.1.6 and 5.1.1.1.7 differ?

Perhaps these should be collapsed or perhaps rewritten to more clearly indicate the distinct focus.



257 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=257>  

	
Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Add sub-metrics to 4.2.3

Seems like several sub-metrics could be added.  If not, then

metric and sub-metric could be combined.


265 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=265> 

Section 4  : Digital Object Management

Ensure that we use OAIS terminology

We should use OAIS terminology where possible because the other terms like "preservation  metadata" are not well deined.

 

3 IPELTU -for latest version see https://cwe.ccsds.org/moims/docs/MOIMS-DAI/Draft%20Documents/IPELTU/CCSDS653.0R0%20MM_BB-20191117.doc?Web=1 on CWE or https://cwe.ccsds.org/moims/docs/MOIMS-DAI/Draft%20Documents/IPELTU/CCSDS653.0R0%20MM_BB-20191117.doc?Web=1 on Dropbox

 

Regards

 

..David

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20191203/cda30ecf/attachment-0001.html>