[Moims-dai] FW: PAIS GB (word version)

[John Garrett]

I understand that some people didn’t receive this message and were
requesting a copy.

This is the copy that we thought was sent to CCSDS.

 

Wishing you prosperity and peace,

-JOhn

 

From: Boucon Daniele [mailto:Daniele.Boucon at cnes.fr] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:53 AM
To: Mario.Merri at esa.int
Cc: moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org; D or C Sawyer <Sawyer at acm.org>; John
Garrett <garrett at his.com>; rdowns at ciesin.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: PAIS GB (word version)

 

Dear Daniele,

 

I’ve seen your question to Gael concerning the license.

 

Except for this previous comment that is still open, please find enclosed
the updated version of the GB, including:

*        The answer to your comments (enclosed and highlighted inside the
comments)

*        The updates with revision marks in the text.

 

Is that ok for you?

 

Regards,

 

Daniele

 

De : Mario.Merri at esa.int <mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int>
[mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int] 
Envoyé : mercredi 4 novembre 2015 16:35
À : Boucon Daniele
Cc : moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org <mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> 
Objet : Re: PAIS GB (word version)

 

Dear Daniele, 

I have been able to just browse through the documents. I find the document
very comprehensive although extremely complicated. The examples are very
detailed, but massive and quite discouraging if one does not have real need
to implement it, but wants just to understand what PAIS is about. If this is
the tutorial, I do not want even to think what the PAIS BB is!. Maybe, at
least the initial section should be kept very simple without digging into
the details. In this context, it is also very difficult to review as this
can be done only by experts. Therefore, I will have to thrust the expertise
in your WG. 

Another issue is the license of the ESA SIP Builder SW. I am not sure if
this license is legal for ESA. Who has agreed to this from ESA? Here we are
talking about world-wide distribution and ESA has rules for this. Have these
rules been applied? 

I have raised a few comment in the document, although the ones above are the
major ones. 

Regards, 

__Mario 




From:        "Boucon Daniele" <Daniele.Boucon at cnes.fr
<mailto:Daniele.Boucon at cnes.fr> > 
To:        "Mario.Merri at esa.int <mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int> "
<Mario.Merri at esa.int <mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int> > 
Cc:        "moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org <mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org>
" <moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org <mailto:moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org> > 
Date:        16/10/2015 10:45 
Subject:        PAIS GB (word version) 

  _____  




And now the word version, 
  
Regards, 
  
Daniele 
 [attachment "651x2g0-1.docx" deleted by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA] 

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender.
 
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20160209/f7ca9157/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 651x2g0-1 MM DAI.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 2874007 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20160209/f7ca9157/attachment.docx>