TR: Re: [Moims-dai] TR: MOIMS Report to CMC

Tue Apr 14 15:59:45 UTC 2015

Hi all,

Please find below an email sent from Mike (with comments from me), but it seems that nobody received it. Hope it'll work this time. 

This emails focuses on points I'd like us to discuss during next telecon or the following one.

Regards,

Daniele

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Moims-dai] TR: MOIMS Report to CMC
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:28:58 -0700
From: Mike Martin <tahoe_mike at sbcglobal.net>
To: moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org

Hi Daniele

1.  Regarding slide 8, I would be interested to hear more about the bullet:

"Discussion with incoming AD and DAD regarding current and future projects and possible interactions with other WGs "
[Boucon Daniele] The discussion was mainly on the future projects presented during the London meeting. M Merri will organize meetings with potential other WGs during the next Darmstad meeting.

I think we need to follow the work on the information model from the new Mission Planning and Scheduling WG in MOIMS that is mentioned in the presentation.  We also need to keep up with Peter Shames' efforts in SEA for a CCSDS ontology and revision of RASDS.
[Boucon Daniele] 
[Boucon Daniele] Good proposal. Please find also below information from Peter Shames, I'd like to have your point of view on this:
______________________________________________________________
>From Peter Shames:
...  we have been analyzing the whole set of SANA registries.   Much as with the XML situation, we do not yet have a good policy for the management of the set of SANA Registries.  There are now 38 of them, developed independently by our Working Groups.   Since we now have many active working groups and they are starting to intersect more, and to use each others information, it should come as no surprise that some of the registries that have been created now contain duplicated information model elements and definitions.  The most obvious examples are where there are three or more registries of "agency" type definitions and a similar number of "person" definitions.  

Your working group may be one of the key groups who care about such topics, so if you are interested I would like to share with you the draft that I have just produced for a Registry Management Policy.  This is just a draft at this point, but it is intended to be brought forward more widely in the near future.  If you have the time and the inclination to review it and provide feedback at this early stage please let me know.
___________________________________________________________

2.  What did Steve Hughes have to say during the Wednesday discussion?
[Boucon Daniele] Steve explains the topic he's working on (and what has been put in place), that is strongly related to  the ICP standard we are developing. He is interested to participate (TBC).

3.  I remember an action item from David asking that someone send out the FEPC (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/fep/) document.  I have attached a paper that the group was working on called "Thoughts about levels of complexity and specialization in data types and structures for
storing scientific data".   I have also attached a paper I did a few
years ago looking at some major contenders used by the NASA science disciplines (sciencemodelsandmethods.pdf).

Thanks, Mike

On 4/7/2015 8:45 AM, Boucon Daniele wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached the MOIMS report sent by Nestor.
>
> Ok for me, except with the number of participants:
>
> *NASA is 4 (instead of 3)
>
> *BnF with 3 people
>
> If you have comments, please send them to me by next Monday 13^th April.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Daniele
>
> *De :*Nestor.Peccia at esa.int [mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int] *Envoyé :* 
> mardi 7 avril 2015 16:50 *À :* Mario.Merri at esa.int; Behal Brigitte; 
> danford.s.smith at nasa.gov; Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int; 
> roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk; Boucon Daniele; John Garrett; Berry, 
> David S (3920); Juergen.Fertig at esa.int; David Mittman *Objet :* MOIMS 
> Report to CMC
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have compressed all the WG reports and produced Draft 3 of the MOIMS 
> Report to the CMC. This will be my last MOIMS report. Following ones 
> will be done by Mario / Brigitte.
>
> Please be aware that MOIMS report shall be around 20 charts. I have 
> tried to put all info. Some general info (repeated by all Areas) will 
> be put at the end of the CESG report (i.e. thanks to Caltech, etc, 
> etc)
>
>
>
> Comments welcome at the latest by  Wednesday 15th April 2015 cob. No 
> comments n=by thyen implies that you are happy with the report
>
> ciao
> nestor
>
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
>
> The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
> whole or in part) of its
>
> content is not permitted.
>
> If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
>
> Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moims-dai mailing list
> Moims-dai at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: levels-layers16.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 737280 bytes
Desc: levels-layers16.doc
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20150414/02a4c4d5/attachment.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sciencemodelsandmethods.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 49448 bytes
Desc: sciencemodelsandmethods.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20150414/02a4c4d5/attachment.pdf>