[Css-rasg] Re: ExoMars Architecture update?

[Shames, Peter M (313B)]

As usual, I returned to my day job and got swept into the vortex of "Things That Must Be Done".  I promise inputs by the end of the week.

Peter



From: Gert Villemos <gert.villemos at logica.com<mailto:gert.villemos at logica.com>>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:46:33 -0700
To: Erik Barkley <Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>, "Colin.Haddow at esa.int<mailto:Colin.Haddow at esa.int>" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int<mailto:Colin.Haddow at esa.int>>, Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Cc: Nestor Peccia <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>>, Mario Merri <Mario.Merri at esa.int<mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int>>, CCSDS RASG <CSS-RASG at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:CSS-RASG at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: RE: ExoMars Architecture update?

Hi Eric,

Peter send some very interesting documentation on methodology (thanks Peter), but I did not receive any suggestions to update / addition of functional elements from anyone. We would very much welcome this input.

I will update the recommendation with the comments raised at the meeting that I can correct without input. I will be away next week, so it will be the 8th of July, not the 20th of June as planned.

Regards,
Gert.




From: Barkley, Erik J (317H) [mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Montag, 20. Juni 2011 21:53
To: Colin.Haddow at esa.int<mailto:Colin.Haddow at esa.int>; Villemos, Gert; Shames, Peter M (313B)
Cc: 'Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:'Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>'; Mario Merri; CCSDS RASG
Subject: ExoMars Architecture update?

My notes from the Berlin meetings indicate that Gert was to receive inputs with regard to the function definitions by 10 June. In particular, Peter had an action item to provide additional functional inputs by 10 June. I will admit that my e-mail goes by rather fast sometimes but to the best of my knowledge I don't believe anybody supplied any inputs?  There was then supposed to be an update with regard to the ExoMars architecture document so that a teleconference could be held on 17 June. The general idea was then to produce the updated document by 30 June. So far I don't think we are doing so good on this. Does anyone have any updates with regard to their function definition inputs and/or updates to the ExoMars architecture document?  I suspect we need to do a bit of a rescheduling here.  Status updates would be much appreciated. Thank you.

Best regards,

-Erik

Think green - keep it on the screen. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-rasg/attachments/20110621/f09160bf/attachment.html