[Css-csts] Re: inconsistent name for cross support/css node

[Yves.Doat at esa.int]

Dear John,

I had you mail pending in my inbox from some time and being in the plane 
to the meeting I finally found a moment to read and process it (coffee in 
the left hand, keyboard in the right hand and your mail in the remaining 
one).

I corrected the css vs 'cross support services' inconsistencies you 
spotted.

I also updated the sentence in C1-a with the one your proposed.

Regarding the figure C1, I changed the title as you proposed. I did not 
removed the SLE link. This link is in dotted line to give the reader the 
knowledge of where it appears in the tree. 
Aside from this and in addition, I would be very much interested to know 
what other numbers have been registered under  CCSDS.

Best regards

Yves




From:
John Pietras <john.pietras at gst.com>
To:
"Yves.Doat at esa.int" <Yves.Doat at esa.int>
Cc:
"CCSDS_CSTSWG (css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org)" <css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:
02/04/2013 16:22
Subject:
inconsistent name for cross support/css node



Yves,
This is a minor point but it will need to be fixed before the release of 
the CSTS SFW for Red-2 review. The Object Identifier Tree in Annex C 
labels the (4) node under ccsds(4) as ?cross support?, whereas in annexes 
E and K it is labeled ?css?. Labeling the node ?cross support in annex C 
may have been my doing, and if so, please accept my apologies. It is also 
listed as ?cross support? in annex D (again, my doing). Obviously these 
should all be made the same. I have no strong feelings towards or against 
any of them.
 
Also, the Introduction (C1) to annex C states that the annex defines ?a) 
the object identifier tree structure used by the procedures defined in 
this Recommended Standard?, but does not mention that it also defines the 
tree structure under which functional resource types and their associated 
parameters, event, and directives are registered. I suggest rewording 
bullet (a) to read ?the object identifier tree structure that is used (1) 
by the procedures defined in this Recommended Standard and (b) to register 
functional resource types and their associated parameters, event, and 
directives.?
 
Finally,  the title of figure C-1 is ?CSTS Root Object Identifier Tree?, 
but this is not quite right: it also depicts the crossSupportResources and 
SLE nodes. The SLE node is probably there because it show the CSTS node in 
relationship to SLE one, but it might be confusing to the new reader 
(e.g., it might give the impression that these are the only nodes that 
have been registered under the CCSDS node). If the SLE node were 
eliminated from the diagram (it is never actually mentioned in the text) 
then the diagram would depict only those nodes that are defined in the 
CSTS SFW. The title of the document would still not be quite right, 
however. The simplest and most accurate fix would be to change it to ?CSTS 
and Cross Support Resources Root Object Identifier Tree?. 
 
Best regards,
John
 
 


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20130415/98370db0/attachment.html