[Css-csts] RE: acknowledged procedure and started procedure definitions no longer applicable

[Yves.Doat at esa.int]

Dear John,

Thanks for your comment. I updated the document as follows:

I added the following definitions:
1.6.1.4.21      Statefull procedure: a procedure with two substates: ready 
and active.
1.6.1.4.22      Stateless procedure: a procedure without substate.

I corrected the typo in table E-6.

I removed the note under E3-9 in annex E.

Best regards

Yves




From:
"John Pietras" <john.pietras at gst.com>
To:
<Yves.Doat at esa.int>
Date:
10/11/2011 22:52
Subject:
RE: acknowledged procedure and started procedure definitions no longer 
applicable



Yves,
I just noticed a typo in Annex E. In table E-6, the definition of 
?transition to inactive? should be ?Internal event ?that it has transition 
to the ?inactive? state?.
 
Best regards,
John
 
From: John Pietras 
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:54 PM
To: Yves.Doat at esa.int
Cc: css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: acknowledged procedure and started procedure definitions no 
longer applicable
 
Yves,
I just noticed that section 1.6.1.4 still has definitions for acknowledged 
procedure (1.6.1.4.2) and started procedure (1.6.1.4.17). We got rid of 
these terms when we created the simpler CSTS with stateful prime procedure 
service state machine (Annex E). These terms now appear nowhere in the 
CSTS SF except in the Additional Definitions section.
 
Ironically, there are numerous references to stateful and stateless 
procedures in the document, yet neither is defined in section 1.6.1.4.
 
Finally, the Note under E3.9 in Annex E about started and acknowledged 
procedures should be deleted because it is now meaningless.
 
Best regards,
John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20111113/2515607e/attachment.html