[Css-csts] RRMDT Version W0.91

Yasunori Iwana iwana.yasunori at jaxa.jp
Fri Aug 19 05:00:12 EDT 2005


sorry I found a error in the documents just after I sent them.
please forget the Version W0.9, and take the Version W0.91.

Under the Directory of RRMDT Version W0.91:
RRMDT_Service_W091.doc
RRMDT_Service_W091_SeeChanges.doc

Yasunori Iwana wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I have uploaded to the Directory of RRMDT Version W0.9
> in the css-csts CWE homepage(private) the following two files:
> RRMDT_Service_W09.doc
> RRMDT_Service_W09_SeeChanges.doc (You can see the change
> records)
>
> This update is corresponding to the comments to Version W0.8
> from David Berry in JPL.
> I corrected editorial errors, but remain the technical points
> as they are, because the RRMDT White Book is subject to change
> in accordance with the GENERIC Service Toolkit White Book which is
> still immature.
>
> Yasunori Iwana
> JAXA
>
> David Berry wrote:
>
> > p.1-3, sec 1.5.2 (b):  "instanciation" should be "instantiation"
> >
> > p.1-5, sec 1.7.1:  In the sentence "The terminology used in this
> > recommendation are...", the word "are" should be "is".  Also, in the same
> > section, "Suppot" should be "Support".
> >
> > p.2-1, sec 2.3:  "(i.e. orbital measurement data)" should probably be
> > "(e.g., orbital measurement data)" since some of the measurement data is
> > not associated with orbit measurement (e.g., meteorological data, media
> > data).  Also, some of the data is not radiometric either, so I preferred
> > the name of the service when it had "tracking" in the name, though I recall
> > you had a reason why you changed from "tracking" to "radio-metric".
> >
> > p.2-2, sec 2.3, paragraph 2:  The phrase "an GENERIC" occurs a few times,
> > but should be "a GENERIC".  I observed this minor error in several places
> > in the document.  As a general rule, the article "an" only occurs prior to
> > a word that begins with a vowel.
> >
> > p.3-2, sec 3.2.3:  In the first sentence, "The offline delivery mode is
> > optional for the Real-time Radiometric Data Transfer Service", the words
> > "offline" and "Real-time" seem somewhat contradictory.  Is the word
> > "Real-time" necessary in the name of the service?  For example, the word
> > "real-time" is not present in the command or telemetry SLE services, but
> > they both are generally real-time.
> >
> > p.3-2, sec 3.3:  The word "behavier" should be "behavior".  This occurs
> > twice in the paragraph.
> >
> > p.3-7, table 3-5:  "Total Phase Count" has been removed from the Tracking
> > Data Message document, at least in the last couple of drafts.  It could
> > re-emerge, but at this point I doubt it.  It may be safe to remove this
> > from Table 3-5.  Also, I'm wondering about the number of combinations of
> > tracking data types that will be allowed.  Conceivably you might need to
> > allow up to 10 concatenated instances in the data-type-request or 160
> > bits.  How is the number of concatenated data types indicated?  There does
> > not appear to be a counter or delimiter in the table.
> >
> > p.3-8, sec 3.6.2.4:  "GENERIC service application" should be "GENERIC
> > service applications".
> >
> > p.3-10, sec 3.8.2.1:  "the value correspondent" should be "the value
> > corresponding".
> >
> > p.3-12, sec 3.9.2.1, last sentence:  "data production is dependent on a
> > type" should be "data production is dependent on the type"
> >
> > p.3-14, sec 3.11.2.1:  how is "number-of-data-delivered" quantified?
> >
> > p.3-17, sec 3.12.2.3:  "the detailed configuration parameter" should be
> > "the detailed configuration parameters"
> >
> > p.3-17, table 3-12:  the word "moduration" should be "modulation" (occurs 3
> > times in the table).
> >
> > p.3-19, Table 3-14:  for the "Set Doppler Measurement" operation, I wonder
> > if it should just enable/disable the *delivery* of the data by the SLE
> > provider, rather than disabling the *measurement* by the producer.
> >
> > p.3-19, Table 3-14:  this is mostly an FYI, but the Tracking Data Message
> > represents all angular measurements in degrees.  I'm not sure what the
> > standard of the Ranging Working Group is for the phase modulation.  Since
> > these are just examples, I wonder if the "NOTES" below the table are just
> > example notes too?
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > At 10:49 PM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
> >
> > >-------- Original Message --------
> > >Subject: GENERIC Service & Real-time Radio-metric Whitebooks
> > >Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:53:04 +0900
> > >From: Yasunori Iwana <iwana.yasunori at jaxa.jp>
> > >To: CCSDS Cross Support Services
> > ><css at mailman.ccsds.org>,dave.israel at nasa.gov, tim.ray at nasa.gov,
> > >jean-claude.rubio at cnes.fr
> > >
> > >CCSDS/CSSA Colleagues,
> > >
> > >please find attached files (zipped):
> > >'Cross Support Generic Service Part1: Toolkit' Whitebook 0.1and
> > >'Part4: Real-time Radio-metric Data Transfer Service' Whitebook 0.8.
> > >
> > >Now the RRMDT service is one of the GENERIC service applications.
> > >The Common Part is described in the 'GENERIC Service Toolkit', and
> > >the Application Specific Part is described in the 'RRMDT Service'
> > >
> > >Toolkit Book has 214 pages.
> > >RRMDT Book has 41 pages.
> > >
> > >Yasunori Iwana
> > >JAXA




More information about the Css-csts mailing list