[CMC] Re: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015

Mario.Merri at esa.int Mario.Merri at esa.int
Mon Jul 6 16:23:45 UTC 2015


Brian,

I have also replied to the CESG poll conditions. Please see the 
attachment. 

Is there anything else that you need from me?

Regards,

__Mario

----- Forwarded by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA on 06/07/2015 18:19 -----

From:   ccsds techsupport <ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>
To:     Mario Merri <Mario.Merri at esa.int>, 
Cc:     Nick Tongson <NickT at aiaa.org>, Nestor Peccia 
<Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, "CCSDS Management Council (CMC at mailman.ccsds.org) 
(CMC at mailman.ccsds.org)" <CMC at mailman.ccsds.org>, Behal Brigitte 
<Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr>, "Thompson Roger" <Roger.Thompson at scisys.co.uk>, 
"Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int" <Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int>, CCSDS CESG -- 
<cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   06/07/2015 18:03
Subject:        Re: [Secretariat] [CMC] CMC Poll: CMC-P-2015-05-003 
Creation the    MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG



Mario,

I have been informed that the issues are related to the CESG poll 
conditions and not the CMC poll conditions.

Also, I have CCed the CESG on this response.  The initial e-mail included 
CESG-EXEC, which is not a valid e-mail address.

Thanks,

Brian
----- Forwarded by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA on 06/07/2015 18:19 -----

From:   Mario Merri/esoc/ESA
To:     "Brian Oliver" <BrianO at aiaa.org>, 
Cc:     "Thomas Gannett" <tomg at aiaa.org>, Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   20/05/2015 11:05
Subject:        Re: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015


Brian,

could you please issue the CMC poll? Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks


__Mario
----- Forwarded by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA on 20/05/2015 11:04 -----

From:   Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA
To:     Mario Merri/esoc/ESA at esa, 
Cc:     "Thomas Gannett" <tomg at aiaa.org>, "peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov" 
<peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "ccsds techsupport" 
<ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>, "moims-mp at mailman.ccsds.org" 
<moims-mp at mailman.ccsds.org>, "cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org" 
<cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   20/05/2015 11:02
Subject:        Re: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015



Poll has to be issued by Brian
Not Tom
Copy Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 20.05.2015, at 17:53, Mario.Merri at esa.int wrote:

Dear Tom, 

herewith I confirm that the issues raised by Peter have been resolved. 
Please issue the CMC poll. 

Best regards, 

__Mario 



From:        ccsds techsupport <ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org> 
To:        "cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org" <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>, 
Date:        29/04/2015 04:10 
Subject:        [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015 
Sent by:        cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org 



CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission 
Planning and Scheduling WG 

Results of CESG poll beginning 09 April 2015 and ending 23 April 2015: 

Abstain:  0 (0%) 
Approve Unconditionally:  7 (87.5%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, de Cola, 
Calzolari, Suess, Barton) 
Approve with Conditions:  1 (12.5%) (Shames) 
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS: 
Barkley - A comment: the goals section of the charter ends mid-sentence as 
presented for the poll.  My assumption is that the goals, to be consistent 
with the stated scoping of "...The submission of Planning Requests (input 
to Mission Planning) ? The distribution of Plans/Schedules (output of 
Mission Planning)..." will include blue books specifications for these two 
items. 

Shames - I have two concerns about this WG, as stated in the charter and 
white paper: 
1) The focus in most of these materials seems to be on SM&C and how it can 
solve the problem, rather than on Mission Planning and a clear 
presentation of what they need.  This is both "cart before the horse" and 
looks like an overly tight binding that may be detrimental to the overall 
usability of the resulting standards. 
2) The WG leadership is exclusively Euro-centric.  Since there does appear 
to be a significant North American interest in this it would be sensible 
to broaden the coverage to recognize that. 

Total Respondents: 8 

No response was received from the following Area(s): 

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions 
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:  Once Conditions are met start CMC Poll 
_______________________________________________
CESG-all mailing list
CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee 
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete 
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the 
sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_______________________________________________
CESG-all mailing list
CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150706/ac29dbb4/attachment.html>


More information about the CMC mailing list