[CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions

[JAXA CCSDS Secretariat]

Dear Tom Gannett-san,

Thank you for taking care of JAXA comments on the CCSDS A02.1-Y-4.
JAXA accepts the proposed dispositions.

However, regarding the releasing of the document, we consider we should
wait until some concerns/comments expressed by other agencies are cleared.


Regards,

N.Nomura
JAXA CCSDS Secretariat

CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote:
> 
>  Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions
>     Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:10:46 -0500
>     From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>       To: CMC-exec at mailman.ccsds.org
>       Cc: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
> 
> Dear CMC Members:
> 
> The recent joint CESG/CMC polls to approve release of CCSDS 
> A02.1-Y-4, Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee 
> for Space Data Systems (Yellow Book, Issue 4) closed with conditions.
> 
> While it is possible to devote valuable agenda time at the next CMC 
> meeting to discussion of these conditions, I have nevertheless 
> proposed dispositions that could allow release of the document prior 
> to the meeting (see attached file).
> 
> The CESG members who voted for conditional approval have already 
> agreed to the proposed dispositions. If the CMC members who voted to 
> adopt provisionally were to agree to the proposed dispositions of 
> both the CMC provisions and CESG conditions, there would be no need 
> to add an agenda item to the upcoming meeting to resolve the issues.
> 
> Therefore the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally, i.e., the 
> CNES, DLR, ESA, and JAXA delegates, should "reply all" to this e-mail 
> to indicated one of the following options:
> 
> 1) the proposed dispositions are acceptable, and release of the 
> document should proceed; or
> 
> 2) the proposed dispositions are NOT acceptable and release of the 
> document should be delayed until after discussions take place at the 
> upcoming CMC meeting.
> 
> Other CMC members should respond only if they object to releasing the 
> document prior to the meetings.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tom Gannett