[CMC] FW: [Secretariat] [CESG] A new version of the Strategic Plan covering some CMC comments

[T. Shigeta]

Dear Mike-san,

JAXA is fine with the changes made in the first 12 pages of the 
Strategic Plan.

Best regards --- Shigeta



(2014/04/01 20:49), Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01) wrote:
> CMC Colleagues:  At the request of CESG/Nestor, please respond if you
> have any issues with Nestor’s proposal.  This will allow him to better
> prepare for the CMC meeting, with disucssions during this Friday’s CESG
> meeting.
>
> Nestor’s proposal is that we should agree on the first section (first 12
> pages) of high-level material, prior to the “Technical Strategic
> Goals”.  The CESG will be working on the technical strategic goals for
> some time.  But if the CMC can reach agreement on the first 12 pages,
> the CESG will be well-positioned to publish the Strategic Plan soon.
>
> So, the question is:  Are there any remaining issues on the first 12
> pages (prior to Technical Strategic Goals)?
>
>     -=- Mike
>
> Mike Kearney
>
> Lead Technology Manager
>
> Mission Operations Laboratory
>
> NASA MSFC EO-01
>
> +1-256-544-2029
>
> *From:*secretariat-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
> [mailto:secretariat-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
> *Sent:* Friday, March 28, 2014 3:40 PM
> *To:* cmc at mailman.ccsds.org
> *Cc:* cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
> *Subject:* [Secretariat] [CESG] A new version of the Strategic Plan
> covering some CMC comments
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached an updated version of the Strategic Plan for
> internal CMC review, only covering the comments received until (and
> including) Section " High level Goals".
>
> Why am I doing that ? To facilitate and shorten our discussion during
> the CESG / CMC meeting. If you can review and agree this new version
> before 4th April we will reduce the number of items to address.
>
> The following has been done:
>
>   * Leave Charter as it was originally (deleting purposes 7 and 8)
>   * Create a new section " CCSDS Management, External Relations and
>     Outreach Strategic Goals" including the CMC ERO Goals and text from
>     the last 3 paragraphs added in " High level Goals"  (also
>     considering NASA comments)
>   * Delete the reference to six areas in the section "Standardisation
>     concept" , which are referenced later. There was a reference to the
>     six areas in a previous version but similar text was duplicated in
>     the same section.
>   * Delete the 3 last paragraphs of " overall strategic goals" (as
>     mentioned above)
>
>
> I have some responses to DLR's comments
>
>   * general formatting: The purpose is to include the text in the CWE.
>     Foermatting will be checked at that instance
>   * spelling: I will do for Issue 1
>
> to UKSA
> " collect requirements" have dissappeared once we return to original
> charter
>
>
>
> The following comments need further discussions at CESG level (4th April
> 2014). Therefore are not included yet in Draft 14.
>
> *_CNES comments_*
> Technical goals (page 10 + 11)
> * What is the rationale for having "file transfer operations" in goals 2
> and 4 ; does it mean that they are independent or that end to end
> transfers are not planned for cross support ?
> *@ Peter: Please prepare response  for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> * System architectures and information architectures were not part of
> the [technical goal # 6] as handed over by the CMC to the CESG in July
> 2013 (see attachment). I believe this was a concious omission, following
> the lack of interest and of resources by the members in the previous
> initiatives to develop such standards. This addition and the new goal
> SEA-Goal 8 (page 15) require a specific approval by the CMC.
> *@ Peter: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> * SANA in page 14 should be clarified: either it will remain a WG of the
> SEA and may then respond to its SEA goals … or, as I had understood, the
> WG is disbanded and the SSG is referred to as part of the CCSDS
> organization and as a Management tool.
> *@ Peter: Please prepare response  for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> * CSS goal 4 in page 23 - A future work that says there will be a
> standard and the tentative title of the standard will be "xxx "would be
> better than sentences showing that it is not clear what will be produced
> as long as the BOF doesn't tell us. This should be fixed before the SP
> is issued.
> *@  Erik: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> * SLS Goal 3 in page 30- there is a text (instead of a document title)
> when pointing out the future work on the NG SDLP. This generates some
> ambiguity, e.g. the terms "new" that could be understood as "replacement
> of the old one (no such decision made - and maybe no agreement that this
> is the goal) or  "unified" as the NG SDLP may not be more unified as the
> current SDLP. "NG" or even better, "Enhanced", should be wide enough for
> the purpose of the SP. Also the domains of application, if listed, are
> either not agreed, or may later turn out to be restrictive: they should
> not be mentioned. As the SP is not the right place to justify why items
> are part of the future work and there are later steps to define the
> scope and objectives of such work it is estimated that a tentative title
> of the BB (or suite) and an explanation limited to "higher performance
> and added security" should be enough for the purpose of the SP.
> *@  Gippo: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April*
>
> *_DLR Comments_*
> My point on SAN I cannot verify. SANA is still appearing in the SEA
> goals (SEA goal 5).
> *@ Peter: Please prepare response  for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> Beside that I have beside general formatting an spelling issues – I
> think, someone will have a look on these if the comments are agreed, I
> have to issues:
>
> First, for my knowledge ISO is no longer going for three year reviews,
> so we should only keep five year reviews in the text
> *@ Tom: Please prepare response  for CESG meeting on 4th April*
> and second, we should already generate book numbers for those books
> which are already listed in the plan.
> *@ Tom: Please prepare response  for CESG meeting on 4th April*
>
> ciao
> nestor
>
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
>
> The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
>
> content is not permitted.
>
> If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
>
> Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CMC mailing list
> CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc
>