[CMC] FW: [Secretariat] [CESG] A new version of the Strategic Plan
covering some CMC comments
Juan.Miro at esa.int
Juan.Miro at esa.int
Tue Apr 1 10:34:08 EST 2014
Dear Mike,
ESA agrees with the first 12 pages of the Strategic Plan as proposed by
Nestor (including to leave the Charter as is)
Regards
Juan
From: "Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)" <mike.kearney at nasa.gov>
To: "CCSDS Management Council (CMC at mailman.ccsds.org)"
<CMC at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int"
<Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, "Tai, Wallace S (JPL-9000)[Jet
Propulsion Laboratory]" <wallace.s.tai at jpl.nasa.gov>,
Date: 01/04/2014 13:53
Subject: [CMC] FW: [Secretariat] [CESG] A new version of the Strategic
Plan covering some CMC comments
Sent by: cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
CMC Colleagues: At the request of CESG/Nestor, please respond if you have
any issues with Nestor’s proposal. This will allow him to better prepare for
the CMC meeting, with disucssions during this Friday’s CESG meeting.
Nestor’s proposal is that we should agree on the first section (first 12
pages) of high-level material, prior to the “Technical Strategic Goals”. The
CESG will be working on the technical strategic goals for some time. But if
the CMC can reach agreement on the first 12 pages, the CESG will be
well-positioned to publish the Strategic Plan soon.
So, the question is: Are there any remaining issues on the first 12 pages
(prior to Technical Strategic Goals)?
-=- Mike
Mike Kearney
Lead Technology Manager
Mission Operations Laboratory
NASA MSFC EO-01
+1-256-544-2029
From: secretariat-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [
mailto:secretariat-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 3:40 PM
To: cmc at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [Secretariat] [CESG] A new version of the Strategic Plan covering
some CMC comments
Dear all,
Please find attached an updated version of the Strategic Plan for internal
CMC review, only covering the comments received until (and including) Section
" High level Goals".
Why am I doing that ? To facilitate and shorten our discussion during the
CESG / CMC meeting. If you can review and agree this new version before 4th
April we will reduce the number of items to address.
The following has been done:
Leave Charter as it was originally (deleting purposes 7 and 8)
Create a new section " CCSDS Management, External Relations and
Outreach Strategic Goals" including the CMC ERO Goals and text from the
last 3 paragraphs added in " High level Goals" (also considering NASA
comments)
Delete the reference to six areas in the section "Standardisation
concept" , which are referenced later. There was a reference to the six
areas in a previous version but similar text was duplicated in the same
section.
Delete the 3 last paragraphs of " overall strategic goals" (as
mentioned above)
I have some responses to DLR's comments
general formatting: The purpose is to include the text in the CWE.
Foermatting will be checked at that instance
spelling: I will do for Issue 1
to UKSA
" collect requirements" have dissappeared once we return to original charter
The following comments need further discussions at CESG level (4th April
2014). Therefore are not included yet in Draft 14.
CNES comments
Technical goals (page 10 + 11)
* What is the rationale for having "file transfer operations" in goals 2 and
4 ; does it mean that they are independent or that end to end transfers are
not planned for cross support ?
@ Peter: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
* System architectures and information architectures were not part of the
[technical goal # 6] as handed over by the CMC to the CESG in July 2013 (see
attachment). I believe this was a concious omission, following the lack of
interest and of resources by the members in the previous initiatives to
develop such standards. This addition and the new goal SEA-Goal 8 (page 15)
require a specific approval by the CMC.
@ Peter: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
* SANA in page 14 should be clarified: either it will remain a WG of the SEA
and may then respond to its SEA goals … or, as I had understood, the WG is
disbanded and the SSG is referred to as part of the CCSDS organization and as
a Management tool.
@ Peter: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
* CSS goal 4 in page 23 - A future work that says there will be a standard
and the tentative title of the standard will be "xxx "would be better than
sentences showing that it is not clear what will be produced as long as the
BOF doesn't tell us. This should be fixed before the SP is issued.
@ Erik: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
* SLS Goal 3 in page 30- there is a text (instead of a document title) when
pointing out the future work on the NG SDLP. This generates some ambiguity,
e.g. the terms "new" that could be understood as "replacement of the old one
(no such decision made - and maybe no agreement that this is the goal) or
"unified" as the NG SDLP may not be more unified as the current SDLP. "NG" or
even better, "Enhanced", should be wide enough for the purpose of the SP.
Also the domains of application, if listed, are either not agreed, or may
later turn out to be restrictive: they should not be mentioned. As the SP is
not the right place to justify why items are part of the future work and
there are later steps to define the scope and objectives of such work it is
estimated that a tentative title of the BB (or suite) and an explanation
limited to "higher performance and added security" should be enough for the
purpose of the SP.
@ Gippo: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
DLR Comments
My point on SAN I cannot verify. SANA is still appearing in the SEA goals
(SEA goal 5).
@ Peter: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
Beside that I have beside general formatting an spelling issues – I think,
someone will have a look on these if the comments are agreed, I have to
issues:
First, for my knowledge ISO is no longer going for three year reviews, so we
should only keep five year reviews in the text
@ Tom: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
and second, we should already generate book numbers for those books which are
already listed in the plan.
@ Tom: Please prepare response for CESG meeting on 4th April
ciao
nestor
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or
addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.(See attached
file: CCSDS-StratPlan-A01x1y1x1-d14-28thMar14.docx)
_______________________________________________
CMC mailing list
CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCSDS-StratPlan-A01x1y1x1-d14-28thMar14.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2892966 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20140401/d51f85a2/CCSDS-StratPlan-A01x1y1x1-d14-28thMar14-0001.obj
More information about the CMC
mailing list