[CMC] Results of CMC Polls closing 15-22 March 2013

[ccsds techsupport]

CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-001
Approval of Changes to SLS - Space Link Protocols Working Group Charter
and New Project


Results of CMC poll beginning 1 March 2013 and ending 15 March 2013:

ADOPT: 7 (100%) (CNES, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 7 out of 11 members (63.64%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CNSA
CSA
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2013-03-005
Inferred Secretariat Action: Approve Charter and Project

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-002
Resolution recommending the deletion of the MOIMS - DAI Project SFDU/XFDU
Referencing Environments, Issue 2


Results of CMC poll beginning 1 March 2013 and ending 15 March 2013:

ADOPT: 7 (100%) (CNES, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 7 out of 11 members (63.64%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CNSA
CSA
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2013-03-006
Inferred Secretariat Action: Delete Project

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2013-03-003
Motion to dissolve the SIS - Asynchronous Message Service Working Group

Results of CMC poll beginning 1 March 2013 and ending 15 March 2013:

                 ADOPT:  7 (100%) (CNES, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 7 out of 11 members (63.64%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CNSA
CSA
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2013-03-007
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Dissolve Working Group

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-004
Approval of New Projects for SEA - Security Working Group

Results of CMC poll beginning 4 March 2013 and ending 18 March 2013:

ADOPT: 5 (100%) (DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 5 out of 11 members (45.45%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CNSA
CSA
DLR
FSA
UKSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2013-03-008
Inferred Secretariat Action: Approve Working Group Projects



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-005
Approval of New Project for SLS - RF and Modulation Working Group


Results of CMC poll beginning 5 March 2013 and ending 19 March 2013:

ADOPT: 7 (100%) (CNES, DLR, ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 7 out of 11 members (63.64%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CNSA
CSA
UKSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2013-03-009
Inferred Secretariat Action: Approve Working Group Project



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-006
Approval of CCSDS Code of Conduct


Results of CMC poll beginning 8 March 2013 and ending 22 March 2013:

ADOPT: 9 (100%) (ASI, CNES, CNSA, DLR, ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 9 out of 11 members (81.81%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

CSA
UKSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2013-03-010
Inferred Secretariat Action: Approve Code of Conduct

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-007
Approval of new WG Charter and Projects - MOIMS - Telerobotics Working
Group

Results of CMC poll beginning 8 March 2013 and ending 22 March 2013:

ADOPT: 6 (75%) (ASI, CNSA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 2 (25%) (DLR, ESA)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

	DLR: maybe we can add a word to the charter like:
„[…] We anticipate the need to develop a new standard in the areas of
(tele-present) safe robot and human-robot operations in the presence of
disruption prone and time delayed communications links, as well as a
standard that facilitates the integration of and operation of
multi-sourced robotics exploration systems. […]“
	ESA: ESA assumes that the production of the standard roadmap will be done
first and then the production of the standard will start, in order to
ensure that efficient use of resources.
At this point ESA can only approve and commit to support the production of
the standard roadmap green book.
ESA proposes to limit for the moment the scope of the WG to the production
of the green book and once the radmap is completed there should be another
consultation on how to proceed.

Results are based on responses from 8 out of 11 members (72.72%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

CNES
CSA
UKSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Address Provisions; Approve Working Group
Charter with Projects

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2013-03-008
Authorization to approve the draft minutes from the December 2012 CMC
meeting at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida


Results of CMC poll beginning 11 March 2013 and ending 25 March 2013:

ADOPT: 4 (50%)  (CNSA, DLR, FSA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 4 (50%) (CNES, ESA, INPE, JAXA)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)

	CNES: 1 - Was China represented by CNSA only or CNSA + CAS as per my
notes, please check.
2 - In 15.1, correct the sentence (information): J.-M. Soula also informed
the CMC that they will provide information  on public/alternative
transportation for those who will be staying in Bordeaux and near the
meeting venue. 
3 - In 15.1, correct the sentence (hotel): J.-M. Soula asked the CMC for
advise on how to prioritize the limited hotel rooms (33 rooms) available
at the meeting venue (i.e. determine a criteria).
4 - From §16 to §22, the texts differ from the minutes jointly established
with IOAG, including remarks made by MKearney ; please check the version.
As required, also clarify the words "the Chairman", as it is not always
clear if this refers to the chair of CCSDS, IOAG, MOSCG, …
	ESA: I find the Minutes very good and detailed. I just have a small
comment regarding section 13.1 and the sentence: "J. Miro requested K.
Scott's participation on the team developing the "Big Picture" roadmap."
I remember that he was proposed to be part of the WG but I do not think I
actually requested him to be part of it. The reason is that it might be
easier for me to work with an Area Director from ESA located at ESOC. in
any case this has not been decided and K. Scott may at the end be the one.
I just would like to leave this open and remove the sentence.
	INPE: For the sake of better expressing what was meant by Eduardo
Bergamini (INPE), please, consider the FROM/TO substitutive texts for the
following excerpt from the minutes, drawn from Section "10.4 CMC Questions
on Written CESG Report":
FROM: INPE/Bergamini: Noted the cross support and inter-compatibility of
documents and suggested guidelines for starting new work to help mitigate
overlapping projects. E. Bergamini recommended using the findings of the
Reference Architecture SIG as the foundation for these guidelines.
TO: INPE/Bergamini: Suggested that, in the earliest possible time and,
observing a simple but also an objective content, as possible, a basic
document to be entitled, or likely, or equivalently, under the name
"GUIDELINES FOR AVOIDING OVERLAPPING AMONG WGs", to be possibly inspired
from the main conclusions obtained from the (ad-hoc, chaired by E.
Barkley) REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE SIG work, should be elaborated and, in
sequence, CESG-CMC approved and, then, firmly used by -all- CESG WGs, with
the express purpose of avoiding the overlapping among all, on going and
future CCSDS-CESG projects, therefore, under this practice, guaranteeing
to its best possible level that cross-unsupportable, uninterroperable,
besides possible duplicated work among the many CESG WGs, which result in
their products and deliverables may not occur. This suggestion claims for
a CESG ACTION ITEM, combined with CMC subsequent analysis and approval.
	JAXA: T. Shigeta clarified that they are not using JAXA specific SOIS
standards but rather adopting the CCSDS SOIS standards within JAXA.
is modified as follows;
T. Shigeta reported that JAXA Design Standards for communication system
and SM&C system conform to the CCSDS recommendations.

Results are based on responses from 8 out of 11 members (72.72%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI
CSA
UKSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Address Provisions; Approve Minutes