[CMC] RE: ICPA review / Just 3 comment for LDPC + SCCC + IPoC

Mon Sep 17 06:23:44 EDT 2012

Jean-Marc,
        Just 3 quick comments
- LDPC codes (CCSDS 131.0) : The book is published and therefore "all 
tasks completed". 
- SCC codes (CCSDS 131.2.B1) : The book is published and therefore "all 
tasks completed". 
- IP over CCSDS (CCSDS 702.1) : CWE Project has been updated to show that 
publication is expected after the CMC poll for publication closing on Sept 
14 2012 

Regards

Gian Paolo

From:
Soula Jean-Marc <Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr>
To:
"Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)" <mike.kearney at nasa.gov>, 
"Michael.Schmidt at esa.int" <Michael.Schmidt at esa.int>, 
"Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>, "Tai, 
Wallace S" <wallace.s.tai at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc:
Nestor Peccia <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, CCSDS Management Council 
<CMC at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Adde, Barbara (HQ-CG000)" 
<barbara.adde at nasa.gov>, "Wan, Stephanie Diana. (HQ-CG000)[ASRC MANAGEMENT 
SERVICES INC]" <stephanie.wan at nasa.gov>
Date:
17/09/2012 12:05
Subject:
RE: ICPA review

Dear all,

sorry for the late response but the deadline for comments was on a 
week-end and I had no internet access.
I hope the below may still be taken into account.

I have included in the same message the comments from both the IOAG and 
the CCSDS CNES Rep.

General:
The ICPa is fine and will definitely help in the future coordination 
between the two organizations.

IOAG comments:
- Spacecraft Perturbations Message (CCSDS 507.0), Spacecraft Maneuver 
Message (CCSDS511.0)  and Pointing Requests Message (CCSDS 509.0) do not 
formally belong to an IOAG SC#. They have not been reviewed and ranked. As 
they are in Priority 3, it doesn't hurt for the short term. Comment should 
indicate : "Priority TBC" or "under review".
- Conjunction Data Message was evaluated by IOAG and should read "Priority 
1".
- As RF & Modulation standard (CCSDS 401.0) is an underlying standard to 
most of the services in SC#1, it should be in "Priority 1" ? or the 
details of the Projects in progress should be pointed out if we want to 
differentiate priorities at a lower level. 
- SM refactoring : An IOAG comment should be added to refer to the March 
30 letter from IOAG to CCSDS, as "Priority 1" is allocated based on the 
requirements and priorities in that letter.
- It would be appropriate to add those documents  to be produced by CCSDS 
as an answer to the IOP request to develop a SSI architecture : if already 
in the list, such documents should have a comment that they belong to this 
category ; if not yet in the list, such documents should be added (e.g.: 
Cross support service architecture) even if a MB.

CCSDS comments:
- LDPC codes (CCSDS 131.0) : What is the meaning of "all tasks completed" 
? Wasn't it published and approved at ISO together with its companion MB 
on coding profiles ?
- SCC codes (CCSDS 131.2.B1) : What is the meaning of "all tasks 
completed" ? Wasn't it published after the CMC epoll for publication 
closing on March 1st 2012 ?
- IP over CCSDS (CCSDS 702.1) : updated the CWE Project has been updated 
to show that publication is expected after the CMC poll for publication 
closing on Sept 14 2012 
he status "Behind schedule" to be updated ? Won't it be published after 
the CMC epoll for publication closing on Sept 14 2012 ?

Best regards

Jean-Marc Soula
CNES - DCT/OP/C-STA
Advisor, GN Operations
18 Avenue Edouard Belin
31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 - France
Tel.: +33 (0)5 61 2 74647
Fax.: +33 (0)5 61 2 73135
Email: Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr 
De : cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] 
De la part de Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)
Envoyé : mercredi 1 août 2012 00:23
À : CCSDS Management Council
Cc : Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org; Nestor Peccia
Objet : [CMC] ICPA review

CMC members:  The IOAG-CCSDS Product Agreement (ICPA) is ready for your 
review and a vote before baselining it. 

Please review the online data at this website:
http://cwe.ccsds.org/fm/Lists/Projects/IOAG.aspx

The four joint IOAG and CCSDS technical leaders that have compiled this 
data, based on existing agreements and understandings, are Adrian Hooke, 
Wallace Tai, Gian-Paolo Calzolari and Michael Schmidt.  At the same time 
the IOAG will be reviewing the ICPA and compiling any comments that they 
may have. 

If you have comments, please send them to the Secretariat and the CESG 
Chairs (Adrian and Nestor) by September 15.   You can copy the CMC mail 
list if you feel that your comments need review by the rest of the CMC. 

The overall schedule is this: 

CMC review from now until Sept 15 (7½  weeks from now).  This long period 
is to accommodate summer holidays. 
On Sept 17 comments and changes will be incorporated. 
CMC poll from Sept 18 until October 2 to approve the baselined ICPA. 

A quick refresher on the ICPA: 

The first seven column describe the CCSDS document projects from our 
database.  Notice ?IOAG Services? in that document are listed. 
There are three IOAG columns that describe their priority, need dates and 
comments.
There are two CCSDS columns that describe the CCSDS response to the IOAG 
statements. 

?Agreed? in the CCSDS column means that the document work is approved and 
we agree to meet the IOAG requested priority and schedule.   ?Under 
Review? in the CCSDS response simply means that CCSDS cannot yet agree to 
providing the document on the requested schedule, usually due to resource 
limitations.  Notice that all of the ?Under Review? items say ?Unapproved? 
in the Charter column, because that work has not yet been approved by the 
CMC. 

I hope this goes smoothly and we will soon have a functioning online 
IOAG-CCSDS Product Agreement database. 

Best regards, 

   -=- Mike

Mike Kearney
Lead Technology Manager
Mission Operations Laboratory
NASA MSFC EO-01
+1-256-544-2029

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20120917/99f6797b/attachment-0001.htm