[CMC] Re: IOP - IOAG - CCSDS
Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
Fri Oct 31 10:06:55 EST 2008
Jean-Marc, I believe at this stage now of the confusion it is up to IOP to
decide. As agreed in CMC the CCSDS Secretariat will make a request to the
IOP chairman for a CCSDS presentation by myself (as I said I don't insist
that it is me) and let's see how IOP reacts formally. In ESA the IOP
delegate (Director of Operation) has no authority over CCSDS (it is the
Technical Director).
Best regards, JFK
"Soula Jean-Marc" <jean-marc.soula at cnes.fr>
31.10.2008 15:58
To
<Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int>, "Adrian J. Hooke"
<adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov>
cc
"CCSDS Management Council" <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject
RE : [CMC] Re: IOP - IOAG - CCSDS
I'm under the impression that we still have the same options :
- go to the IOP chair as he is the one who may influence the agenda (no
collective IOP decision will be made before IOP meets)
- elaborate the CCSDS presentation that was discussed at the last CMC and
let Narita-san present it ("compromise" accepted within IOAG and still
questionned within CMC)
- give up with the CCSDS issued presentation and leave the IOP decide on
CCSDS related issues (*) based mainly on an IOAG point of view
(*) : to comment on the IOAG organization chart, IOP delegates may have
authority on CCSDS, as per each agency organization ; the reason for the
link between Agency name and IOP delegate, in the chart, is that the IOAG
charter was not supposed to impose any internal organization to any agency
... In CNES case, the IOP delegate has enough authority on both CCSDS and
IOAG activities of CNES, in particular regarding the technical policy and
the staffing.
Personally, I'm fine with options 1 or 2 but I would be disappointed with
option 3, above all if some CCSDS views are missing just because of a
different speaker.
Best regards
Jean-Marc Soula
CNES - DCT/OP/C-STA
Advisor, GN Operations
18 Avenue Edouard Belin
31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 - France
Tel.: +33 (0)5 61 2 74647
Fax.: +33 (0)5 61 2 73135
Email: Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr
-----Message d'origine-----
De : cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org]
De la part de Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
Envoyé : vendredi 31 octobre 2008 14:39
À : Adrian J. Hooke
Cc : CCSDS Management Council
Objet : [CMC] Re: IOP - IOAG - CCSDS
Adrian, I agree and I think there is no dispute about that even in IOAG,
there is no hierarchical relation between IOAG and CCSDS. But on the other
it is up to IOP / IOAG to decide about their agenda and to talk about
CCSDS, and apparently it is not foreseen to have a presentation made by
CCSDS.
Best regards, JFK
"Adrian J. Hooke" <adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov>
31.10.2008 14:05
To
"Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int" <Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int>
cc
"CCSDS Management Council" <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject
Re: IOP - IOAG - CCSDS
At 06:00 AM 10/31/2008, Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int wrote:
It is not (maybe it was, but is not anymore) the intention of IOP to have
a presentation made by CCSDS about CCSDS, but rather to have an IOAG
Agency presenting its views about the relation / experience with CCSDS.
Jean-Francois: that's a quetionable position, since it appears to assume
that it is the IOAG which decides on the agenda for the IOP. However, such
as assumption does not appear to be supported by the IOAG's Terms Of
Reference (attached). Nothing in those Terms Of Reference implies a
"hierarchy", where the CCSDS and SFCG are subservient to the IOAG. In
fact, the "Organizational Relationships" diagram on the IOAG's website
clearly shows two opposite things:
1. That the relationship between CCSDS and IOAG is simply a "Liaison
Function"
2. That the Agencies who staff the CCSDS also staff the IOP - without
being filtered by the IOAG.
The notion that the IOAG should be able to present "its views about the
relation / experience with CCSDS" is fine. However, the notion that the
CCSDS should be prevented from presenting the Plenary with its own views
about interoperability - and perhaps about its experiences with the IOAG -
does not appear to be supported by the established organizational
relationships.
Best regards
Adrian
Adrian J. Hooke
Chairman, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group (CESG) and
CCSDS Technical Liaison to the IOAG[attachment "IOAG-tor.pdf" deleted by
Jean-Francois Kaufeler/esoc/ESA]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20081031/4a819ef6/attachment.html
More information about the CMC
mailing list