[CMC] RE: IOP-2 Agenda - SFCG, CCSDS, SIAG Presentations

[narita.kaneaki]

Dear JFK and Adrian,
 
I think I will be a editor using your previous reports and presentations,
referring to previous CMC and CESG pitch in Berlin, by consensus basis. The
discussion points that we should be cool down during the preparation with
CMC member based on the IOAG point of view is how we present (make) the
relationship between the IOAG and the CCSDS, and other bodies such as ISECG
and ILN.
 
The key message to the IOP from IOAG about the CCSDS is that the CCSDS is
the appropriate technical forum to evolve the interoperability in the space
communications and navigation considering to and driven by the future
multi-agency mission coordination bodies. 
 
The followings are key presentation structure that I would like to propose
you all:
- Scope (or Objective) of CCSDS
- Organization (History, area of activity, using CCSDS Interactive Technical
Reference Model and others, relationship with ISO/SC13)
- Achievement (# of CCSDS mission, # of Standardization)
- Management Structure (Relationship with IOAG and CMC, Operating (Infusion)
Plan, WG Charter, etc.)
- Special Topics (SANA, etc)
 
I think it would be a good idea to introduce the ESA internal coordination
framework (mentioned below e-mail, 2nd para.) and others (more softly
representing their mission needs to the CCSDS activities) for information
basis.
 
I appreciate your support!
Best Regards,
 
Narita
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int [mailto:Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int]

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:28 AM
To: Adrian J. Hooke
Cc: CCSDS Management Council; Narita Kaneaki
Subject: Re: [CMC] RE: IOP-2 Agenda - SFCG, CCSDS, SIAG Presentations



Adrian, 

I am not 100% clear, but I believe it is the latter. Narita should know
better than me, since he is participating in those IOAG discussions. The CMC
(e.g. Mike) made a clear request to IOP, but the answer is open for
interpretation. The only think clear seems to be that Narita is making the
presentation. Thus nothing would prevent him to explain what is CCSDS, what
it has achieved, on what it is working now, how it liaises with other
bodies. 

I have a concern: it seems to me that sometimes NASA position in CMC is not
fully coordinated internally to NASA with their Projects. While for ESA
there is a process whereby all ESA positions are internally coordinated with
Projects through the ESA Standardisation Board (and also behind the scene at
ECSS level) I don't if and how a similar process works in NASA. The
impression I have is that this might be at IOAG level! This point ought to
be addressed during the forthcoming IOP discussion. At least the question
will be asked. 

Best regards, JFK 






"Adrian J. Hooke" <adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov> 


06.11.2008 16:59 


To
"Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int" <Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int>, Narita
Kaneaki <narita.kaneaki at jaxa.jp> 

cc
"CCSDS Management Council" <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org> 

Subject
Re: [CMC] RE: IOP-2 Agenda - SFCG, CCSDS, SIAG Presentations

	




At 03:39 AM 11/6/2008, Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int wrote: 
I understand that IOP wishes that an IOAG member being also CMC member
presents the CCSDS work / liaison from an IOAG viewpoint. 

Narita-san and Jean-Francois: are we clear about the subject of this
presentation? Is it a CCSDS view of future interoperability, or is it a
review of CCSDS from an IOAG viewpoint?

///adrian 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20081107/7c7a060a/attachment.htm