[CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report,
CCSDS Mailman SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Eduardo Bergamini
e.w.bergamini at uol.com.br
Tue Oct 23 18:03:39 EDT 2007
Dear CMC Colleagues,
I hope that this 3rd. trial message may reach you all, this time, after the fundamental
support I received from our Secretariat colleagues, Brian Oliver, Erin Kahn and Craig Day.
Although Jean-François (excuse me for receiving it again, now through the CMC e-list) has
already confirmed it to me, as the original and main addressee, I wish also to (re-)send
to you the original text I had addressed him and you twice, in Cc., although unsuccessfully,
as reproduced in the attachment, below.
Thank you. Best regards,
Eduardo
INPE/CCSDS
___________________________________________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Eduardo Bergamini
To: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
Cc: Eduardo W. Bergamini
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Re:Re: [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS
Mailman SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Dear Jean-François,
Thank you for your certainly opportune confirmation. Again, I still did not receive my Cc.
from the CMC list, after this second trial. If indeed so, after a reasonable time out, I will
have to check for it with Erin. Naturally, I also wonder if our other colleagues from the CMC
list may have received the message (besides you, in this case, from the list), as well.
She had confirmed to me, after my first trial with the same message, that the CMC list
mailer had not registered it. Let us see.
Best regards,
Eduardo
___________________________________________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
To: Eduardo Bergamini
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 8:58 AM
Subject: Re:Re: [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS Mailman
SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Dear Eduardo,
Yes I got your earlier message.
All the best, JFK
"Eduardo Bergamini" <e.w.bergamini at uol.com.br>
23.10.2007 14:11
To <Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int>
cc <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Erin Kahn" <erink at aiaa.org>
Subject Re:Re: [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS Mailman SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Dear Jean-François,
After Erin's kind verification and advice, I am sending you a second time the
attached message. I would appreciate if you can confirm it, although you are also
in the CMC list. I received no Cc. from it in my previous trial. Thank you.
With my best regards,
Eduardo
__________________________________________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Eduardo Bergamini
To: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
Cc: cmc at mailman.ccsds.org
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS Mailman
SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Dear Jean-François,
I do concur with you.The statistics you referred to is being consistently high for a long
time, now. OAIS is certainly a big hit of CCSDS, among others.
OAIS is already a Brazilian Standard, ABNT NBR 15472, as of May 2007. The
"Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard" (CCSDS 651.0-B-1), a
natural off-spring of the OAIS standard, is also being developed as a Brazilian, ABNT
standard.
The SFDU and XFDU are important, interoperable concepts that are already (fortunately)
being practiced in many of our CCSDS agencies, that came to stay, as I understand it.
As an active member of the "old" Panel 2, which is now embedded in the MOIMS Area, I
do remember the many visits (since 1983 ...) of experienced and certainly competent
space agency information management expertees that, for the sake of praising the
importance of (then) Panel 2 work, gave us detailed presentations on the high costs they
were facing (when possible) for mining, retrieving, structuring and organizing sometimes
massive data of many past missions which were being eagerly needed due to the
importance of their contents, for the sake of their pending applications in science and
other practical fields. The sadest part of their presentations is that they told us of some
past, costly missions whose data could not be made useful at all, anymore, due to
limitations like: the many descriptors (formats, dictionaries, etc.) of "piles" of data were
simple lost, if ever compiled ...; tapes could not be read any more because their
compatible drivers were already gone in dusty corners of werehouses, etc. Comparatively,
space missions today often generate much higher volumes of data which, due to simple
limitations of the pertinent agencies and associates can be digested and analysed only
in later dates. A task that can easily take years ...
DAI & IPR WG are also, among the others, most important for support to space missions.
Among other reasons, for making available products that support the organized and lower
cost availability, accessability and structured and interoperable legacy of data, not only in
the present, but also in the (very) long run (not an easy task). We should not also forget
that some types of data have their value actually increased with time. This is especially
true when data is needed for evaluating a world which is in constant change in a global
scale, like ours ...
Best regards,
Eduardo
__________________________________________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int
To: cmc at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc: Laura Stafford
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS Mailman SPAMReport, and CCSDS Publication Report
Dear All,
I recall the discussion we had in the last CMC on the whether or not we shall continue to work on archival standards !?
The statistics repeatedly confirm that the OAIS standard is by far the most popular one. Archival issues are an important aspect of cross-support for Space Data Systems. Therefore it truly belongs to the mandate of CCSDS and there is a large customer base.
I remember that the CMC disposition was to continue, but I hope that we will not ask this question again and again.
Best regards, JFK
Laura Stafford <lauras at aiaa.org>
Sent by: cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
19.10.2007 22:56
To CCSDS Secretariat <secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>, cmc at mailman.ccsds.org, cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
cc
Subject [CMC] September 2007 - CCSDS.org Usage Report, CCSDS Mailman SPAM Report, and CCSDS Publication Report
Attached are the following:
- CCSDS.org Usage Report:
- Shows the number of unique hits
- Shows total number of hits
- Shows total number of publications downloaded
- Shows top 10 downloaded publications
- Shows top 10 downloaded publications in "rank view" compared
to previous month ranks.
- CCSDS Mailman SPAM Report
- Shows the number of messages sent to Mailman
- Shows the number of messages that were SPAM
- Shows the number of virus sent to Mailman
- CCSDS Publications Report
- Shows all CCSDS publications sorted in descending order by number
of downloads. Also, the previous months metrics are provided for
comparison.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
--Laura [attachment "CCSDS Website Usage Report - September 2007.pdf" deleted by Jean-Francois Kaufeler/esoc/ESA] [attachment "CCSDS Mailman Summary SPAM Report - September 2007.pdf" deleted by Jean-Francois Kaufeler/esoc/ESA] [attachment "CCSDS Publications Usage Report - September 2007.pdf" deleted by Jean-Francois Kaufeler/esoc/ESA] _______________________________________________
CMC mailing list
CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc
______________________________________________
CMC mailing list
CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20071023/2bd2a84e/attachment.htm
More information about the CMC
mailing list