[CMC] Re: [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for April 2006

Mon Apr 24 10:33:56 EDT 2006

Gentlemen,
I would like to inject in the context of that discussion the point that a 
concurrent polling of the CMC and CESG is a confusing practice. We may get 
different views from members of the same agency. We should avoid this. I 
think that we should separate the roles: some polls are exclusive to the 
CESG for its working process. At the end every thing will surface at CMC 
level anyhow. The CMC polls are for final agreement / decisions from the 
agencies representatives.
We should address this procedural aspect at the next CMC.
Best regards, JFK

"Dissinger Neil (CCSDS Sub Contr)" <neil.dissinger at btas.com> 
20.04.2006 19:39

To
Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int, "Oliver Brian (BTAS)" <brian.oliver at btas.com>
cc
Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int, Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int, 
cmc at mailman.ccsds.org, cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org, 
cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org, secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject
RE: [CMC] Re: [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for April 2006

Jean-Luc,

A CMC resolution at the 2006 Fall meetings approved a concurrent CESG and 
CMC review of Green Books:

CMC-R-0510-14     Resolves to modify Procedures and Restructuring 
documents to state that Green books are reviewed concurrently by the CESG 
and CMC.
The concurrent review was implemented to speed up the approval process for 
Green Books.  There were discussions about this process at both the CESG 
and CMC meetings.  After the comments from the CESG ADs are resolved the 
document will be submitted to the CMC for final approval. 

Regards,

Neil

From: cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org on behalf of Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int
Sent: Thu 4/20/2006 12:43 PM
To: Oliver Brian (BTAS)
Cc: Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; 
cmc at mailman.ccsds.org; cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; 
cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [CMC] Re: [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for April 2006

Oliver,
I cannot agree with your report below.
CCSDS 350.1-G-1 was submitted to CMC without CESG approval; CESG review 
was
completed 14 April:

CCSDS 350.1-G-1  has been approved conditionally by SIS and SLS and only
after the 'conditions' are resolved will it be possible to submit it to 
CMC
for final approval.
I take the CMC voting is void.

best regards
Jean-Luc Gerner
TEC-ETN
Tel: +31 71 565 4473

             "Oliver Brian  
             (BTAS)"  
             <brian.oliver at btas To
             .com>                      cmc at mailman.ccsds.org,  
             Sent by:                   cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org  
             cesg-all-bounces at m cc
             ailman.ccsds.org           "Tom Gannett (CCSDS Sub Contr)"  
                                        <tom.gannett at btas.com>  
 Subject
             20/04/2006 17:48           [Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results for  
                                        April 2006  

CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-R-2006-03-006: Green Book approval of Security
Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS 350.1-G-1
Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Release Document

The CMC,

CONSIDERING that the Security Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS
350.0.1-G-1 has previously been submitted for CESG review
(CESG-R-2005-08-005) and was not approved;

and ACKNOWLEDGING that the issues concerning the disapproval have been
resolved;

and RECOGNIZING that Green Books require concurrent approval from the 
CESG;

RESOLVES that Security Threats Against Space Missions, CCSDS 350.0.1-G-1 
be
published as an Issue-1 Informational Report.

Results of CMC poll beginning 3 March 2006 and ending 14 April 2006:

ADOPT:  3 (100%) (ASI, CNES, INPE)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
REJECT:  0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 3 out of 10 members (30%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

BNSC
CSA
DLR
ESA
FSA
JAXA
NASA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-A-2006-03-001: Request for Data Compression
Requirements

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Action Completed
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Interpret Requirements

Agencies are requested to provide their data compression requirements 
(e.g.,
hyper-/multi-spectral, radar signal, etc.) for future missions that could 
be
developed by the SLS Data Compression WG into CCSDS Recommended Standards.

Results of CMC poll beginning 3 March 2006 and ending 14 April 2006:

Agency has no requirements at this time:  2 (50%) (INPE, JAXA)
Agency has the following future data compression requirements:  2 (50%) 
(ASI,
CNES)

ASI - ASI is interested in data compression for hyper/multi-spectral and 
SAR
data.
CNES - At CNES level, we may be interested in developing within CCSDS
framework a solution for hyper and multi-spectral images compression. This
assumes that the charter of the WG is revised or a new BOF is created.

Results are based on responses from 4 out of 10 members (40%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:
BNSC
CSA
DLR
ESA
FSA
NASA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 _______________________________________________
CESG-all mailing list
CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all

_______________________________________________
CMC mailing list
CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20060424/8a5efa1d/attachment.html