[CMC] INPE approval.

[Eduardo Bergamini]

Dear CCSDS CMC Colleagues,


INPE wishes to express its approval to the recent CCSDS-OMG  consensus
recommendation, as reported in the attachment. Congratulations to the AI WG
for this long waited and fundamental joint initiative, of fundamental
importance in complementing the scope of the CCSDS program of work.

Sincerely,


Eduardo W. Bergamini
INPE/CCSDS CMC

P.S. Just a minor observation on the attached, CCSDS-OMG document: The final
part of the phrasing of the 6th. Item, under "And Recognizing that:" seems,
instead, to be apparently meaning the equivalent to ..."in terms of developing
a future marketplace for private investment in space." 


----------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Adrian J. Hooke 
To: CCSDS Management Council 
Cc: Pauline.Bolle-Mead at esa.int ; Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int ;
Adrian.J.Hooke at jpl.nasa.gov ; Georges-Henri.Mingot at cnes.fr ;
P.M.Allan at rl.ac.uk ; Andrew.Z.Dowen at jpl.nasa.gov ; Nestor.Peccia at esa.int 
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: [CMC] CMC VOTE REQUIRED: Draft Resolution, CCSDS-OMG Study Group


TO:   CCSDS Management Council
FROM: CCSDS-OMG Study Team

1. In response to an action item from the Autumn 2003 CCSDS Management Council
meeting, a small team met at ESA, Darmstadt on 10-11 March to study future
relationships between the CCSDS and the OMG (Object Management Group). In
attendance were:

Peter Allan (BNSC)
Andy Dowen (NASA)
Adrian Hooke (NASA)
Jean-Francois Kaufeler, (ESA) 
Georges-Henri Mingot (CNES)
John Siegel (OMG)
Nestor Peccia (ESA)

2. The consensus recommendation of the group is attached. The net result is
that we recommend that the OMG should host our two meetings in 2005 (Spring -
Europe; Autumn - USA),thus offering the opportunity for increased technical
interchange between key personnel, and that we will continue to seek a viable
project to demonstrate the utility of OMG technology to the space domain.
However, we will not make any changes to each other's operating procedures,
and neither will we specifically "give up" any CCSDS work to the OMG.

3. The next step is to seek ratification of this draft recommendation by CCSDS
and OMG management. The CCSDS participants believe that this course of action
will be beneficial,  and therefore solicit your e-mail approval. 

4.PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST BY THE "ANSWER ALL" MECHANISM to indicate
whether or not you approve this Draft Resolution.

5. Your response is requested no later than close of business on Friday 26
March, i.e., two weeks from today.

Best regards
Adrian J. Hooke
Chairman, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group (CESG)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
CMC mailing list
CMC at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cmc


____________________________________________________________________
   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft-CCSDS-OMG-Res-11Mar04.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 14326 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20040312/22d6c96d/Draft-CCSDS-OMG-Res-11Mar04.pdf