[CMC]
RE: CMC VOTE REQUIRED: Draft Resolution, CCSDS-OMG Study Group
Allan, PM (Peter)
P.M.Allan at rl.ac.uk
Fri Mar 12 07:49:17 EST 2004
I approve, not surprisingly as I was involved in the drafting.
Peter Allan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Peter M. Allan
Head, Space Data Division
Space Science and Technology Department
CCLRC/Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Chilton
Didcot Tel: +44 (1235) 445723
Oxon OX11 0QX fax: +44 (1235) 446667
England e-mail: p.m.allan at rl.ac.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian J. Hooke [mailto:adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: 11 March 2004 22:41
To: CCSDS Management Council
Cc: Adrian.J.Hooke at jpl.nasa.gov; Andrew.Z.Dowen at jpl.nasa.gov;
P.M.Allan at rl.ac.uk; Georges-Henri.Mingot at cnes.fr; Nestor.Peccia at esa.int;
Jean-Francois.Kaufeler at esa.int; Pauline.Bolle-Mead at esa.int
Subject: CMC VOTE REQUIRED: Draft Resolution, CCSDS-OMG Study Group
TO: CCSDS Management Council
FROM: CCSDS-OMG Study Team
1. In response to an action item from the Autumn 2003 CCSDS Management
Council meeting, a small team met at ESA, Darmstadt on 10-11 March to study
future relationships between the CCSDS and the OMG (Object Management
Group). In attendance were:
Peter Allan (BNSC)
Andy Dowen (NASA)
Adrian Hooke (NASA)
Jean-Francois Kaufeler, (ESA)
Georges-Henri Mingot (CNES)
John Siegel (OMG)
Nestor Peccia (ESA)
2. The consensus recommendation of the group is attached. The net result is
that we recommend that the OMG should host our two meetings in 2005 (Spring
- Europe; Autumn - USA),thus offering the opportunity for increased
technical interchange between key personnel, and that we will continue to
seek a viable project to demonstrate the utility of OMG technology to the
space domain. However, we will not make any changes to each other's
operating procedures, and neither will we specifically "give up" any CCSDS
work to the OMG.
3. The next step is to seek ratification of this draft recommendation by
CCSDS and OMG management. The CCSDS participants believe that this course of
action will be beneficial, and therefore solicit your e-mail approval.
4.PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST BY THE "ANSWER ALL" MECHANISM to indicate
whether or not you approve this Draft Resolution.
5. Your response is requested no later than close of business on Friday 26
March, i.e., two weeks from today.
Best regards
Adrian J. Hooke
Chairman, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group (CESG)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20040312/5f4b3629/attachment-0001.html
More information about the CMC
mailing list