[CESG] CESG-P-2021-06-005 Approval to release CCSDS 414.1-P-2.1, Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[CCSDS Secretariat]

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CCSDS 414.1-P-2.1, Pseudo-Noise (PN) 
Ranging Systems (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) have been disposed to the 
satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The 
Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize release 
for Agency review.
-------------- next part --------------
From:	Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de
Sent:	Thursday, July 22, 2021 3:50 AM
To:	thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Cc:	Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int
Subject:	RE: CESG-P-2021-06-005 Approval to release CCSDS 414.1-P-2.1,  Pseudo-
Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS  Agency review

Categories:	Poll Condition Closure

Ok that's fine.

Thank you,

Tomaso

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
Sent: Freitag, 16. Juli 2021 23:25
To: Cola, Tomaso de <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>
Cc: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int
Subject: Re: CESG-P-2021-06-005 Approval to release CCSDS 414.1-P-2.1, Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging 
Systems (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review

Dear Tomaso,

Footnote 3 appears once on another page of the complete document; it is referenced on more than one 
page of the document. For the purpose of the review, I will assure that the footnote appears on the 
review page.

Please indicate by return email if that satisfies your condition.

Regards,
Tom



CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-06-005 Approval to release CCSDS 414.1-P-2.1, Pseudo-Noise (PN) 
Ranging Systems (Pink Sheets, Issue
2.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2021 and ending 14 July 2021:

                 Abstain:  2 (33.33%) (Merri, Duhaze) Approve Unconditionally:  3 (50%) (Barkley, Sanchez, 
Wilmot) Approve with Conditions:  1 (16.67%) (Cola) Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Tomaso de Cola (Approve with Conditions):   Section 3.3.3 says 
"The value l=94 shall only be used for Ka-band3 uplinks ", however the footnote 3 does not appear in 
the uploaded document (maybe ended up in the following page not provided here?)


Total Respondents:  6

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805