[CESG] CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM Synchronization and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
CCSDS Secretariat
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Thu Jul 22 19:34:25 UTC 2021
Dear CESG Members,
Conditions for approval of CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM Synchronization and
Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) have been disposed to the
satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The
Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize release
for Agency review.
-------------- next part --------------
From: Moury Gilles <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 12:24 PM
To: Thomas Gannett; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov
Cc: Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; Andrea Modenini
(external); Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int
Subject: RE: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM
Synchronization and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS
Agency review
Categories: Poll Condition Closure
Dear Tom,
My conditions are satisfied by your correction of the document.
Best regards,
Gilles
Gilles MOURY
CNES Toulouse
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> Envoyé : vendredi 16 juillet 2021 23:07 À :
Moury Gilles <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>; jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov Cc : Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int;
Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int Objet : Re: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1,
TM Synchronization and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Dear Gilles, Jonathan:
I am making the requested correction. If you can both respond by return email that your conditions are
satisfied, I will not need to delay the CMC poll.
Regards,
Tom
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM Synchronization
and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review Results of CESG poll beginning 30
June 2021 and ending 14 July 2021:
Abstain: 2 (33.33%) (Merri, Duhaze)
Approve Unconditionally: 2 (33.33%) (Barkley, Cola)
Approve with Conditions: 2 (33.33%) (Moury, Wilmot)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Just a comment, not a
condition: it is nice to see that coding on the forward link is being added.
Gilles Moury (Approve with Conditions): ?Remove the terms "forward links" and "return links" and
replace by "ground-to-space links" and "space-to-ground links" as per attached file (Telecom Blue
WG_20210604gpc.docx). Rationale: the terms forward links and return links are not used in other SLS
recommendations. Besides, the proposed definitions of forward and return links refer to the undefined
terms "caller" and "responder".
Jonathan Wilmot (Approve with Conditions): Agree with other comments on return link/forward
link. Space to space (including surface to space, space to surface) blur these definitions. Each side of link
is both commanding and telemetry. Need better common terms to make clear the bi-directionality of
commands and telemetry over the same RF links. Would be good to clear up before agency review
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll after
conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805
-------------- next part --------------
From: Wilmot, Jonathan J. (GSFC-5800) <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 6:55 AM
To: Thomas Gannett; Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr
Cc: Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-
3.1, TM Synchronization and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for
CCSDS Agency review
Categories: Poll Condition Closure
Tom,
Sounds good.. I am sure I will be satisfied with your update, consider the condition closed.
Kind regards,
Jonathan
Jonathan Wilmot
NASA/GSFC
Code 580 Senior Engineer for Flight Systems cFS Software Architect CCSDS SOIS Area Director Office 301-
286-2623 Cell 301-751-2658
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 5:07 PM
To: Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr; Wilmot, Jonathan J. (GSFC-5800) <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>
Cc: Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM
Synchronization and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Dear Gilles, Jonathan:
I am making the requested correction. If you can both respond by return email that your conditions are
satisfied, I will not need to delay the CMC poll.
Regards,
Tom
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.0-P-3.1, TM Synchronization
and Channel Coding (Pink Sheets, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review Results of CESG poll beginning 30
June 2021 and ending 14 July 2021:
Abstain: 2 (33.33%) (Merri, Duhaze)
Approve Unconditionally: 2 (33.33%) (Barkley, Cola)
Approve with Conditions: 2 (33.33%) (Moury, Wilmot)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Just a comment, not a
condition: it is nice to see that coding on the forward link is being added.
Gilles Moury (Approve with Conditions): ?Remove the terms "forward links" and "return links" and
replace by "ground-to-space links" and "space-to-ground links" as per attached file (Telecom Blue
WG_20210604gpc.docx). Rationale: the terms forward links and return links are not used in other SLS
recommendations. Besides, the proposed definitions of forward and return links refer to the undefined
terms "caller" and "responder".
Jonathan Wilmot (Approve with Conditions): Agree with other comments on return link/forward
link. Space to space (including surface to space, space to surface) blur these definitions. Each side of link
is both commanding and telemetry. Need better common terms to make clear the bi-directionality of
commands and telemetry over the same RF links. Would be good to clear up before agency review
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll after
conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805
More information about the CESG
mailing list