[CESG] CESG-P-2020-09-001 Approval to release CCSDS 505.0-P-1.1, XML Specification for Navigation Data Messages (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[CCSDS Secretariat]

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CCSDS 505.0-P-1.1, XML Specification for 
Navigation Data Messages (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) have been disposed to 
the satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. 
The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize 
release for Agency review.
-------------- next part --------------
From:	Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
Sent:	Thursday, October 15, 2020 8:01 PM
To:	Berry, David S (US 3920)
Cc:	CCSDS Secretariat
Subject:	RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: CESG-P-2020-09-001 Approval to release CCSDS 505.0-P-
1.1,  XML Specification for Navigation Data Messages (Pink Book, Issue 1.1)  
for CCSDS Agency review

David,

That is a perfectly good approach given the nature of the condition. Yes let's please proceed with this 
being a RID and let's move on to agency review.

Best regards,
-Erik

-----Original Message-----
From: Berry, David S (US 3920) 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 16:52
To: Barkley, Erik J (US 3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CESG-P-2020-09-001 Approval to release CCSDS 505.0-P-1.1, XML 
Specification for Navigation Data Messages (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review


Erik:

Is it possible that we might deal with the Condition you raised as a "Pre-RID" (or "AD RID")? As you say, 
it's minor, and the same apparent defect exists in the original document 505.0-B-1 that has been around 
for nearly 10 years. These sections are  essentially the same material as in the original Blue Book (big 
difference is that the TDM is no longer described in this version of NDM/XML since the info is now in the 
TDM V.2 Blue Book just published recently). 

If you are OK with this "Pre-RID" or "AD RID" idea, I will fix the issue you have cited during RID 
disposition post Agency Review.

This revised version of the document has a number of improvements with respect to the original and I'd 
really prefer not to slow down the progression to Blue Book. It can sometimes take a while to get back in 
the Polling queue.

Please advise as to your thoughts on the "Pre-RID" proposal.

For your consideration, 
David



On 10/15/20, 1:29 PM, "CCSDS Secretariat" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote:

    Dear Document Rapporteur,

    The CESG poll to approve release of CCSDS 505.0-P-1.1, XML 
    Specification for Navigation Data Messages (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for 
    CCSDS Agency review concluded with conditions. Please negotiate 
    disposition of the conditions directly with the AD(s) who voted to 
    approve with conditions and CC the Secretariat on all related correspondence.


    CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2020-09-001 Approval to release CCSDS 
    505.0-P-1.1, XML Specification for Navigation Data Messages (Pink 
    Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
    Results of CESG poll beginning 30 September 2020 and ending 14 October 2020:

                     Abstain:  1 (16.67%) (Calzolari)
    Approve Unconditionally:  4 (66.67%) (Merri, Shames, Burleigh, Wilmot)
    Approve with Conditions:  1 (16.67%) (Barkley)
    Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
    CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

         Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions):  A minor but I believe 
    helpful condition for those reviewing the document and the usability 
    of the recommendation:

    1) Please add table numbers and brief descriptions for the tables 
    found on pages 4-6, 4-7, 4-11, 4-12, 4-16, 4-19, 4-20, 4-21, and 4-22 
    (and any others I may have missed).  Rationale: a) I believe it is 
    customary practices to include a complete list of tables in the table 
    of contents section, b) some of the table are not necessarily trivial 
    such that a quick way to look up the information will present less 
    frustration/better usability for those reviewing  (and subsequently 
    implementing) the recommenation.


    Total Respondents:  6

    All Areas responded to this question.



    SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
    PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
    conditions have been addressed

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *