[CESG] SEA SAWG proposed edits to the SOIS document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Dear MOIMS & SOIS colleagues,

I requested feedback on this by 22 Feb 2019.  Are you going to have replies and feedback by then?  I want to get this off my plate.

For those who have lost the thread, this is intended as the resolution for the Condition raised on CESG-P-2018-05-010, see https://public.ccsds.org/polls/Lists/CESGP201805010/AllItems.aspx.

Thanks, Peter


From: Peter Shames <Peter.M.Shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:04 PM
To: Mario Merri <Mario.Merri at esa.int>, "Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int" <Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int>, Sam Cooper <sam at brightascension.com>, Roger Thompson <roger.s.thompson at btinternet.com>, Dan Smith <danford.s.smith at nasa.gov>, "Wilmot, Jonathan J. (GSFC-5820)" <jonathan.j.wilmot at nasa.gov>, "Rakow, Glenn P. (GSFC-5610)" <glenn.p.rakow at nasa.gov>, Richard Melvin <Richard.Melvin at scisys.co.uk>
Cc: SEA-SA <sea-sa at mailman.ccsds.org>, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: SEA SAWG proposed edits to the SOIS document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets

Dear All,

As reported during the CESG Telecon on 7 Feb 2019, the Systems Engineering Area (SEA), using resources of the Systems Architecture Working Group (SAWG), has completed a review of the SOIS document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets and proposed a set of updates to resolve differences of opinion between SOIS and MOIMS and clarify the relationships.  This result was derived using meeting and email discussions within the SAWG and particularly with representatives of the two different points of view (Roger Thompson and Ramon Krosley) and the original author of the document (Richard Melvin).  Before sending this document out more widely these parties were polled and they concurred in this release, with two minor issues noted.  Those issues have been dealt with in this version.

Three files are attached:

1)      A "clean" version with changes accepted, but revised text left in red

2)      A raw version with all of the tracked changes visible

3)      A spreadsheet extracted from the marked up PDF files, along with the audit trail of discussions leading to resolution

Since this is, in effect, a cross-area "working group" of sorts I would like to ask all of those who have a stake in this to review the document and provide feedback in two weeks, by 22 Feb 2019.  I'd like to use a consensus process over email and am hoping we can wrap this up quickly.  We will still need to process the final result through the CESG for approval to publish.

Thanks, Peter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20190220/91be84f5/attachment.html>