[CESG] CESG-P-2019-01-003 Approval to release CCSDS 211.2-P-2.1, Proximity-1 Space Link Protocol—Coding and Synchronization Sublayer (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[Thomas Gannett]

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CCSDS 211.2-P-2.1, 
Proximity-1 Space Link Protocol—Coding and 
Synchronization Sublayer (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1, 
February 2019) have been disposed to the 
satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve 
with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed 
with CMC polling to authorize release for Agency review.


>To: Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 8 February 2019
>From: Mario.Merri at esa.int
>Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:43:13 +0100
>
>The proposed change does satisfy my condition. Thank you Massimo.
>
>Regards,
>
>__Mario
>
>
>
>From:        Massimo Bertinelli/estec/ESA
>To:        CCSDS Secretariat 
><thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>, Mario Merri/esoc/ESA at ESA
>Cc:        Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA, 
>"Greg Kazz" <Greg.J.Kazz at jpl.nasa.gov>, miles.gannett at logothete.net
>Date:        17/02/2019 13:24
>Subject:        Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 8 February 2019
>
>
>
>
>Dear Tom and Mario,
>
>the WG proposes the following change to 3.6.4:
>
>The C&S sublayer shall use the Frame Length 
>Field and the Transfer Frame Version Number 
>(TFVN) in the Transfer Frame Header of the 
>Transfer Frame to locate the position of the CRC-32 field in the PLTU.
>
>Would this satisfy Mario's condition?
>In case, Tom, could you please use it for an 
>update version of the book for the Agency Review?
>
>Best regards,
>Massimo
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Massimo Bertinelli
>Communication Systems Engineer
>ESA/Estec
>
>Tel. +31 (0)71 5653435
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>
>-----CCSDS Secretariat 
><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote: -----
>To: <mailto:Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int>Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int
>From: CCSDS Secretariat 
><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>Date: 02/10/2019 08:01PM
>Cc: 
><mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int>Mario.Merri at esa.int, 
>"<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int" 
><<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>, 
><mailto:Greg.J.Kazz at jpl.nasa.gov>Greg.J.Kazz at jpl.nasa.gov, 
><mailto:miles.gannett at logothete.net>miles.gannett at logothete.net
>Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 8 February 2019
>
>Dear Massimo:
>
>The CESG poll to approve release of CCSDS
>211.2-P-2.1, Proximity-1 Space Link
>Protocol­Coding and Synchronization Sublayer
>(Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review concluded with conditions.
>
>Please negotiate dispositions directly with the
>AD who voted to approve with conditions and CC
>the Secretariat on all related correspondence.
>
>Best regards,
>Tom
>
>
> >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 13:40:28 -0500
> >To: <mailto:cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
> >From: CCSDS Secretariat 
> <<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
> >Subject: Results of CESG Polls closing 8 February 2019
> >
> >CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2019-01-003
> >Approval to release CCSDS 211.2-P-2.1,
> >Proximity-1 Space Link Protocol­Coding and
> >Synchronization Sublayer (Pink Sheets, Issue 2.1) for CCSDS Agency review
> >Results of CESG poll beginning 25 January 2019 and ending 8 February 2019:
> >
> >                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
> >  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
> >  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Merri)
> >  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
> >
> >CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
> >
> >Mario Merri (Approve with Conditions): The
> >largest change introduced seems to be the
> >addition of also Version 4 as possible transfer
> >frame in the PLTU. However in the PLTU I cannot
> >see any discriminant between TF v3 and v4. Is
> >this meant to be a pre-agreed decision in a
> >dedicated ICD not part of the standard? If so,
> >would not be more interoperable to add a flag in
> >the PLTU that allows automatic identification of the TF version number?
> >
> >
> >Total Respondents: 5
> >No response was received from the following Area(s):
> >
> >SEA
> >
> >SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
> >PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate
> >CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
>
>
>
>This message is intended only for the 
>recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
>protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, 
>use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
>immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
>personal data, in case of data privacy queries, 
>please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20190218/6cc04af5/attachment.html>