[CESG] CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1)

Thomas Gannett thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Fri May 25 17:33:33 UTC 2018


Dear CESG Members,

 

Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS
350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and
Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1) have been disposed to the satisfaction of
the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now
proceed with CMC polling to authorize publication.

 

 

 

 

From: Barkley, Erik J (3970) [mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:00 PM
To: Thomas Gannett
Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018

 

Tom,  okay, sounds good.  Good luck with all the acronyms!  

 

-Erik

 

 

 

Sent via my phone

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 

Date: 5/25/18 09:04 (GMT-08:00) 

To: "Barkley, Erik J (3970)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018 

 

Erik: If I get a response on this today (or this morning PDT), the book can
go to CMC polling today. Otherwise it will be relegated to the next batch of
CMC polls in a couple of weeks. -Tom

 

 

 

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Gannett [mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net] 
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 1:34 PM
To: 'Barkley, Erik J (3970)'
Subject: FW: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018

 

Erik:

 

Concerning your conditions on CESG-P-2018-05-001 Approval to publish CCSDS
350.5-G-1, Space Data Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and
Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1), Howie and Ignacio have agreed that I should
make the proposed changes.

 

Please indicate by return email whether that satisfies your condition.

 

Tom

 

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Weiss, Howard [mailto:Howard.Weiss at parsons.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 8:06 AM

To: CCSDS Secretariat

Subject: Re: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018

 

Tom

 

Ignacio agrees - go ahead and make the changes.

 

Many thanks,

 

howie

 

 

________________________________

Howard Weiss, CISSP

 

PARSONS, Inc.

7110 Samuel Morse Drive

Columbia, MD 21046

443-430-8089 (office)

443-494-9087 (cell)

443-430-8238 (fax)

howard.weiss at parsons.com

www.parsons.com

 

Please consider the environment before printing this message

 

________________________________________

From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>

Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 6:29 PM

To: Weiss, Howard

Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018

 

Howie:

 

I propose simply making the suggested changes

myself per the conditions (below) for CESG

approval of CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data Link

Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 1).

 

Let me know if you are OK with that.

 

Tom

 

 

>Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:38:59 -0400

>To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org

>From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>

>Subject: Results of CESG Polls closing 21 May 2018

> 

>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-05-001

>Approval to publish CCSDS 350.5-G-1, Space Data

>Link Security Protocol-Summary of Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue
1)

>Results of CESG poll beginning 7 May 2018 and ending 21 May 2018:

> 

>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)

>  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (75%) (Shames, Cola, Moury)

>  Approve with Conditions:  1 (25%) (Barkley)

>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

> 

>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

> 

>Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): 1) Pg

>2-14: From "...cryptographic church key

>management.." to "...cryptographic key

>management...". Rationale: CCSDS is not in the

>business of securing devices to open beer bottles!

> 

>2) Please check for complete popultaion of

>acronyms in Annex E: BC is mssing (as in BC

>Frames -- whereas TC for TC Frames is

>identified). Also, given that COP-1 shows up in

>Annex E, why do other abbreviations such as

>VC_OCF, MC_FSH not show up in here?

> 

> 

>Total Respondents: 4

>No response was received from the following Area(s):

> 

>MOIMS

>SOIS

> 

>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions

>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate

>CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

 

 

NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain privileged and confidential information, and information that is
protected by, and proprietary to, Parsons Corporation, and is intended
solely for the use of the addressee for the specific purpose set forth in
this communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited, and you should delete this message and all copies and
backups thereof. The recipient may not further distribute or use any of the
information contained herein without the express written authorization of
the sender. If you have received this message in error, or if you have any
questions regarding the use of the proprietary information contained
therein, please contact the sender of this message immediately, and the
sender will provide you with further instructions.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20180525/57e5587c/attachment.html>


More information about the CESG mailing list