[CESG] CESG-P-2017-06-002 Conditions

Wed Nov 1 16:31:41 UTC 2017

Dear CESG Members:

Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2017-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been resolved to the satisfaction of the ADs who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling.

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

From: Shames, Peter M (312B) [mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:24 PM
To: Thomas Gannett; 'Sam Cooper'
Cc: 'Mario Merri'; 'Brigitte Behal'; 'Dan Smith'; Barkley, Erik J (3970); Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
Subject: Re: Updated CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Mission Operations—Common Services

Hi Tom & Sam,

I went digging back in the email trail and did find that 5 Oct message (copied below).  It indicates that there 

I also went looking for other messages from Sam and find that I never got any reply from Sam that indicated that he had resolved all of the issues or otherwise disposed of them.  Between 5 Oct and now the only email from Sam was this one that arrived today, 1 Nov.  

I believe that the other PID conditions that I raised were resolved, but I am unable to find any explicit record of it.  That said, I am willing to let this document move forward on the condition that any unresolved CESG Review PIDs will remain in the WG queue and that they will be dispositioned at the same time that any agency RIDs are processed.

Regards, Peter

From: Sam Cooper [mailto:sam at brightascension.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:33 AM
To: Shames, Peter M (312B); Mario Merri
Cc: Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett
Subject: Re: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services

Hi Peter,

I've responded to your red marked rows, see attached. Please let me know if you are happy with the responses.

Cheers,
Sam.

On 03/10/2017 19:03, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote:

Sam, et al,

Here is the SEA feedback on PID dispositions.  Most of these I accepted on the assumption that the proposed changes will fix the issues. However, some, those marked in red, still need work.

Regards, Peter

From: Barkley, Erik J (3970) [mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:02 PM
To: Sam Cooper; Shames, Peter M (312B); Burleigh, Scott C (312B); Mario Merri
Cc: Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett
Subject: RE: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services

Sam,

As my conditions have been accepted and updates indicated I am okay for now.  Thanks for checking.

Best regards,

-Erik 

From: Burleigh, Scott C (312B) [mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:00 PM
To: Sam Cooper; Shames, Peter M (312B); Barkley, Erik J (3970); Mario Merri
Cc: Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett
Subject: RE: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services

Sam, I recognize that your response to the condition I stated reflects what has become the reality of CCSDS specification approval thinking, and on that basis I guess I have to say that you have met my condition.

This is by no means to say that I find this current reality satisfactory.  If the Blue Book definitions and procedures in the Yellow Book cannot accommodate the work that is being done for SM&C, then either the Yellow Book must be updated to reflect reality or else the SM&C books cannot be Blue.  If we are doing otherwise then we are kidding ourselves, and in the long run that compromise will damage CCSDS.

Scott

From: Sam Cooper [mailto:sam at brightascension.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:22 AM
To: Shames, Peter M (312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>; Barkley, Erik J (3970) <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>; Burleigh, Scott C (312B) <scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>; Mario Merri <Mario.Merri at esa.int>
Cc: Dan Smith <danford.s.smith at nasa.gov>; Brigitte Behal <Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr>; Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Subject: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services

Dear All,

Please find attached a short note giving responses to your conditions on releasing 522.0 for Agency review. Please can you confirm/reject our response as appropriate so that we can progress this specification.

For comments where we have accepted your recommendation (or ones that requires change) obviously we have to make that change before you can agree to the release but if you could confirm/reject our proposed change that would be very helpful.

Peter, we have separated out your comments from the PDF mark-up you supplied and responded to each individually. It probably makes sense for you to respond to each comment in that sheet and return that.

Many thanks for your time in reviewing our document, let me know if there is anything that needs further clarification.

Regards,
Sam.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20171101/e42792f5/attachment.html>