<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Dear CESG Members:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2017-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been resolved to the satisfaction of the ADs who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'>Logothete, L.L.C.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:thomas.gannett@tgannett.net">thomas.gannett@tgannett.net</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'>+1 443 472 0805<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Shames, Peter M (312B) [mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov] <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:24 PM<br><b>To:</b> Thomas Gannett; 'Sam Cooper'<br><b>Cc:</b> 'Mario Merri'; 'Brigitte Behal'; 'Dan Smith'; Barkley, Erik J (3970); Burleigh, Scott C (312B)<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: Updated CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Mission Operations—Common Services<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>Hi Tom & Sam,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>I went digging back in the email trail and did find that 5 Oct message (copied below). It indicates that there <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>I also went looking for other messages from Sam and find that I never got any reply from Sam that indicated that he had resolved all of the issues or otherwise disposed of them. Between 5 Oct and now the only email from Sam was this one that arrived today, 1 Nov. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>I believe that the other PID conditions that I raised were resolved, but I am unable to find any explicit record of it. That said, I am willing to let this document move forward on the condition that any unresolved CESG Review PIDs will remain in the WG queue and that they will be dispositioned at the same time that any agency RIDs are processed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>Regards, Peter<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Sam Cooper [<a href="mailto:sam@brightascension.com">mailto:sam@brightascension.com</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:33 AM<br><b>To:</b> Shames, Peter M (312B); Mario Merri<br><b>Cc:</b> Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Hi Peter,<br><br>I've responded to your red marked rows, see attached. Please let me know if you are happy with the responses.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Sam.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 03/10/2017 19:03, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal>Sam, et al,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Here is the SEA feedback on PID dispositions. Most of these I accepted on the assumption that the proposed changes will fix the issues. However, some, those marked in red, still need work.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Regards, Peter<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><o:p> </o:p></p></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Barkley, Erik J (3970) [<a href="mailto:erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">mailto:erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:02 PM<br><b>To:</b> Sam Cooper; Shames, Peter M (312B); Burleigh, Scott C (312B); Mario Merri<br><b>Cc:</b> Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'>Sam,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'>As my conditions have been accepted and updates indicated I am okay for now. Thanks for checking.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'>Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'>-Erik <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Burleigh, Scott C (312B) [<a href="mailto:scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov">mailto:scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:00 PM<br><b>To:</b> Sam Cooper; Shames, Peter M (312B); Barkley, Erik J (3970); Mario Merri<br><b>Cc:</b> Dan Smith; Brigitte Behal; Thomas Gannett<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Sam, I recognize that your response to the condition I stated reflects what has become the reality of CCSDS specification approval thinking, and on that basis I guess I have to say that you have met my condition.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>This is by no means to say that I find this current reality satisfactory. If the Blue Book definitions and procedures in the Yellow Book cannot accommodate the work that is being done for SM&C, then either the Yellow Book must be updated to reflect reality or else the SM&C books cannot be Blue. If we are doing otherwise then we are kidding ourselves, and in the long run that compromise will damage CCSDS.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Scott<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='color:windowtext'> Sam Cooper [<a href="mailto:sam@brightascension.com">mailto:sam@brightascension.com</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:22 AM<br><b>To:</b> Shames, Peter M (312B) <<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>; Barkley, Erik J (3970) <<a href="mailto:erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>; Burleigh, Scott C (312B) <<a href="mailto:scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov">scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>; Mario Merri <<a href="mailto:Mario.Merri@esa.int">Mario.Merri@esa.int</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> Dan Smith <<a href="mailto:danford.s.smith@nasa.gov">danford.s.smith@nasa.gov</a>>; Brigitte Behal <<a href="mailto:Brigitte.Behal@cnes.fr">Brigitte.Behal@cnes.fr</a>>; Thomas Gannett <<a href="mailto:thomas.gannett@tgannett.net">thomas.gannett@tgannett.net</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> CCSDS 522.0-R-1, Spacecraft Monitor and Control—Common Services<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Dear All,<br><br>Please find attached a short note giving responses to your conditions on releasing 522.0 for Agency review. Please can you confirm/reject our response as appropriate so that we can progress this specification.<br><br>For comments where we have accepted your recommendation (or ones that requires change) obviously we have to make that change before you can agree to the release but if you could confirm/reject our proposed change that would be very helpful.<br><br>Peter, we have separated out your comments from the PDF mark-up you supplied and responded to each individually. It probably makes sense for you to respond to each comment in that sheet and return that.<br><br>Many thanks for your time in reviewing our document, let me know if there is anything that needs further clarification.<br><br>Regards,<br>Sam.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>