[CESG] REMINDER: Draft Notes of CESG meeting on 15th May 2017: OMG Liaison
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Wed May 24 14:39:52 UTC 2017
Erik and Peter
I will not take into consideration your comments on the MoU. This will be
addressed once Mario distributes the draft MoU
Sentence "MM will draft a OMG ? CCSDS MoU to be reviewed by CESG and CMC"
stays
i.e.
PS comment
Concur with Erik re wanting something in the MOU language that inserts a
check of new proposed OMG work against the CCSDS body of work. Of course,
the OMG may want this to be reciprocal. While CCSDS is much bigger than
the OMG SDTF, the whole of the OMG is much, much bigger than the whole of
CCSDS.
EB commnet
2) even if agreed by the CESG, I'm tempted to ask the question ?so what??
In reality we cannot leverage requirements on OMG and have no say on their
processes. It strikes me that there needs to be some sort of statement
with regard to a concrete action here that CCSDS cna take. Is such a
concrete action to be part of Mario's draft MOU? For example, perhaps the
MOU can suggest that OMG check with CCSDS before issuing its RFIs and vice
versa?
and wrt to your other comment
I do not recall that we specifically voted on this. But my memory may be
faulty. Nonetheless, I have to wonder:
1) does not CCSDS mandate a similar process when starting a new project? A
project is supposed to be justified based on, among other things, lack of
prior existing standards. The motto for CCSDS has always been "adapt,
adopt, develop" in that order. Is not an RFI process a good way to go
about this? It strikes CCSDS is supposed to do something similar, even if
informally.
I propose to delete the sentence "OMG RFI approach is not suitable to
manage potential overlaps or duplications"
ciao
nestor
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20170524/708b6022/attachment.html>
More information about the CESG
mailing list