[CESG] Lack of a standardised approach for CCSDS Document Number

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Nestor, the quiz is invalid!
You gave hints with the shoemaker motto!   :o)
Ciao
Gippo



From:   Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
To:     "Secretariat" <Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>, "CCSDS Engineering 
Steering Group - CESG Exec(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org)" 
<cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:   13/09/2016 16:50
Subject:        [CESG] Lack of a standardised approach for CCSDS Document 
Number
Sent by:        "CESG" <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>



Dear all, 

I was made aware by an AD (guess whom?) of the different ways a Doc number 
is defined in the CWE 

If you look at http://cwe.ccsds.org/fm/Lists/Projects/AllItems.aspx 
number only (i.e. the correct form) 
number with CCSDS in front 
number with indication of color and issue (for the color there is a 
dedicated field, Issue is normally/often added to the project title) 
number with other field and comments

We can say of ourselves, as an standard organization, "the shoemaker's son 
always goes barefoot" 

Can we do anything about this ? 

ciao 
nestor 
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee 
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete 
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the 
sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160913/564721ab/attachment.html>