[CESG] New draft of "CESG report to CMC"template
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Fri Jul 8 14:38:57 UTC 2016
Gippo
My comments, and a new update attached.
@ADs/DADs: Please comment this draft
ciao
nestor
=============================
SLIDE #5: IS THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM NEEDED ? I want to gather more AD's
view to reach a conclusion. My personal view is that we can use a
semaphore at the top of the page and delete the box.
SLIDE #5: PLANNING BOX OK except for
- Activity background color identifies the book
SLIDE #5: TYPO OK
SLIDE #5: Recommendation
I gues that Recommendation 2 Pages per WG means that the contents
suggested in this slide can be spread in up to two slides and then the WG
can add more ancillary slides for "big" explanations. WG can produce 100
charts, but for the CESG report 2 charts per WG (it could be exceptions,
but 2 is the rule). We should avoid too verbose reports.
SLIDE #6: Area Projects
This slide will be of course duplicating data included by each WG.
I may understand the suggestion for such a duplication o get all the eggs
together, but there is a risk for errors during copy and paste My initial
idea was to put one table for all WGs as Area summary (as SIS did and CMC
recommended). Your initial comment was that this was too much trouble and
error prone. My second suggestion was individual tables per WG and an easy
compilation as Area Summary. and now you are commenting in the other
direction.(due to cut / paste errors). Too picky.
SLIDE #7: Title
I would change from: Xxx Area: Resources Discussion for Approved
Projects
To: Xxx Area: Resources ISSUES OK
Rationale: 1) you want to highlight issues not discussion. 2) The project
is clearly approved since if there were resource issues the project would
have not been approved. Wrong. Read clarification. Once the issue with
missing proto 2 is solved this chart will disappear.
SLIDE #8: Tables......
As for the planning box, I think there should be a table like this for
each WG (i.e. add it to slide 5) such that the summary table is created
with copy and paste as for slide 6.
The same comments as for slide 6 apply.
The same comments for the first column as for the planning table apply. I
do not agree. The number of new WIs for the next 6 months is reduced and
it is better that the AD produces him/herself this table
SLIDE #9: Again a duplication
This slide will be of course duplicating data included by each WG.
I may understand the suggestion for such a duplication o get all the eggs
together, but there is a risk for errors during copy and paste Not
agreed. It is a nice summary for the CMC
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160708/a93e442e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: d03-CESG-Report-to-CMC-Fall 2016 Template.pptx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 245738 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160708/a93e442e/attachment.obj>
More information about the CESG
mailing list