[CESG] Concurrence with dispositioned RIDs on 313x1y0

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Dear Mario and Brigitte,

I may have missed it, but I do not think that we heard back from you as to whether you found the dispositions of your RIDs on 313x1y0, the CCSDS RMP, acceptable.  All of the other reviewers have concurred with the way that theirs were handled.

Would you please respond so we can move ahead with publishing these documents?

Thanks, Peter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160222/9e31d5fc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 313x1y0 CESG RIDs Integrated Disp.xls
Type: application/x-msexcel
Size: 54272 bytes
Desc: 313x1y0 CESG RIDs Integrated Disp.xls
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160222/9e31d5fc/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 313x1y0_CESG RID Updates.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1298697 bytes
Desc: 313x1y0_CESG RID Updates.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160222/9e31d5fc/attachment.pdf>