[CESG] Fwd: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review

Fri May 29 15:46:19 UTC 2015

ADs and DADs:

Conditions for approval to release CCSDS 
881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
Services--RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been 
satisfied. The Secretariat will proceed with CMC polling.

>From: "Barkley, Erik J (3970)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Shames, Peter M (312B)"
>         <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:37:16 +0000
>
>Kevin,
>
>Apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you 
>for the updates.  My conditions stated in the poll have been satisfied.
>
>I will note that I recognize the SANA registry 
>considerations as essentially coming from 
>Peters work in updating the overall SANA 
>registration policy.  And I think a) it is good 
>and proper to have this in a document about to 
>go out for agency review and b) It will be 
>interesting to hear what various agencies have 
>to say about this policy and I would encourage 
>various reviewers to really review this section 
>as this represents a new policy in CCSDS re SANA 
>considerations (vs the current laissez-faire policy).
>
>I look forward to an interesting review.
>
>Best regards,
>
>-Erik
>

>From: "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Shames, Peter M (312B)"
>         <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Barkley, Erik J (3970)"
>         <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:56:23 +0000
>
>Looks better to me; my conditions are satisfied.
>
>                         --keith
>
>From: "Shames, Peter M (312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Barkley, Erik J (3970)"
>         <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:30:35 +0000
>    From: <Shames>, "Peter M (312B)" 
> <<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Date: Monday, May 18, 2015 4:00 PM
>To: Kevin Gifford 
><<mailto:Kevin.Gifford at colorado.edu>Kevin.Gifford at colorado.edu>, 
>"Barkley, Erik J (3970)" 
><<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>"Scott, Keith L." <<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org>
>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>"Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" 
><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>Thomas Gannett 
><<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy 
>Sheynin <<mailto:sheynin at aanet.ru>sheynin at aanet.ru>
>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll 
>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>
>Hi Kevin,
>
>I concur with the RID resolutions that you have 
>applied to this document.  It is acceptable to 
>me for this document to be released for review.
>
>Best regards, Peter

>
>
>From: Kevin K Gifford 
><<mailto:kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>
>Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:15 AM
>To: Peter Shames 
><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>Erik Barkley 
><<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>Keith Scott <<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org>
>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>Richard Barton 
><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>Tom Gannett 
><<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy 
>Sheynin <<mailto:sheynin at aanet.ru>sheynin at aanet.ru>
>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll 
>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>
>Dear Peter, Erik, Keith 
>
>Thank you for your time and expertise in 
>providing the review of the SOIS Wireless WG RFID Tag-Encoding Red Book.
>
>Attached please find two documents detailing the 
>WWG's responses and associated updates.  The WWG 
>concurred with all of the specific 
>comments.  The attached spreadsheet lists the 
>reviewer's (your) critique and lists the WWG 
>action to address the RID along with indicating 
>the specific document pages updated in the 
>second attachment which is a clean version of 
>the document with all identified Review Items dispositioned.
>
>Please let me know if the changes meet with your 
>approval or if you have any remaining 
>outstanding issues that need to be addressed.
>
>Thanks again for your time in reviewing the SOIS 
>Wireless WG RFID Tag-Encoding Red Book.
>
>Kevin
>
>From: Thomas Gannett <<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>
>Date: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:31 AM
>To: Kevin Gifford 
><<mailto:gifford at rintintin.colorado.edu>gifford at rintintin.colorado.edu>
>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>"Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" 
><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>"<mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int" 
><<mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>, 
>"<mailto:peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov" 
><<mailto:peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>"<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov" 
><<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Subject: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 
>Approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft 
>Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding 
>Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>
>Dear Kevin et al.:
>
>The CESG poll to approve release of the SOIS 
>RFID Tag Red Book concluded with conditions. The 
>conditions are stated below--I have attached the 
>SEA AD's mark-up (881x1r0_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf).
>
>I have also attached the Word file 
>(881x1r0_CESG_Approval.doc) used to create the 
>PDF file used in the poll. Please use it to make 
>changes in response to conditions.
>
>Resolution of the conditions should be 
>negotiated directly with the authors of the 
>conditions (CCed) and reported back to the CESG.
>
>Best regards,
>Tom
>
>
>
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-03-006 
>Approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft 
>Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding 
>Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Results of CESG poll beginning 29 March 2015 and ending 15 April 2015:
>
>                  Abstain:  3 (37.5%) (Merri, Behal, Calzolari)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (37.5%) (Suess, Barton, Scott)
>  Approve with Conditions:  2 (25%) (Shames, Barkley)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>
>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This 
>document still needs some work, particularly in 
>the areas relating to the use of SANA and the guidance to the SANA operator.
>
>The data structure is also probably more awkward 
>than it needs to be, but that appears to be a legacy limitation.
>
>please see the attached mark-up.
>
>Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): 
>Condition 1: For this type of recommendation an 
>ICS should be stated to help ensure a good 
>agency review -- it will be useful to know what 
>is mandatory and what is optional in the ID 
>(probably all of it but there is no direct statement of that)
>
>Condition 2: it will be very helpful for agency 
>reviews to know what the policy is for assigning 
>database IDs in SANA -- note that claiming the 
>SANA Registry as the administrator is 
>insufficient as current CCSDS practice is that 
>the recommendation that defines a registry must, 
>necessarily, identify its management policy.
>
>Keith Scott (Approve Unconditionally): I'm 
>willing to let this go through to Agency Review, 
>but the 'To Be Supplied' sections in the 
>document (PICS, Patent Considerations) are 
>questionable. I think the CESG should discuss 
>whether such (admittedly slightly) incomplete 
>documents should be put out for Agency Review.
>
>
>Total Respondents: 8
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
>CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
>
>Thomas Gannett
>+1 443 472 0805

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20150529/264187fe/attachment.html>