<html>
<body>
ADs and DADs:<br><br>
Conditions for approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard
Interface Services--RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1)
for CCSDS Agency review have been satisfied. The Secretariat will proceed
with CMC polling.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">From: "Barkley, Erik J
(3970)" <erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov><br>
To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford@Colorado.EDU>, "Shames,
Peter M (312B)"<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L."
<kscott@mitre.org><br>
CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov>, "Barton,<br>
Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton@nasa.gov>,
Thomas Gannett<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<tomg@aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin@aanet.ru><br>
Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release<br>
CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID
Tag Encoding<br>
Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:37:16 +0000<br><br>
Kevin,<br>
<br>
Apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for the updates.
My conditions stated in the poll have been satisfied. <br>
<br>
I will note that I recognize the SANA registry considerations as
essentially coming from Peter’s work in updating the overall SANA
registration policy. And I think a) it is good and proper to have
this in a document about to go out for agency review and b) It will be
interesting to hear what various agencies have to say about this policy
and I would encourage various reviewers to really review this section as
this represents a new policy in CCSDS re SANA considerations (vs the
current laissez-faire policy). <br>
<br>
I look forward to an interesting review.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
-Erik <br>
<br>
<b></b></blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">From: "Scott, Keith
L." <kscott@mitre.org><br>
To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford@Colorado.EDU>, "Shames,
Peter M (312B)"<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov>, "Barkley, Erik J
(3970)"<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov><br>
CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov>, "Barton,<br>
Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton@nasa.gov>,
Thomas Gannett<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<tomg@aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin@aanet.ru><br>
Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release<br>
CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID
Tag Encoding<br>
Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:56:23 +0000<br><br>
Looks better to me; my conditions are satisfied.<br>
<br>
--keith<br>
<br>
From: "Shames, Peter M (312B)"
<peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov><br>
To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford@Colorado.EDU>, "Barkley,
Erik J (3970)"<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L."
<kscott@mitre.org><br>
CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov>, "Barton,<br>
Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton@nasa.gov>,
Thomas Gannett<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
<tomg@aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin@aanet.ru><br>
Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release<br>
CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID
Tag Encoding<br>
Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:30:35 +0000<br>
From: <Shames>, "Peter M (312B)"
<<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">
peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>><br>
<dl>
<dd>Date: Monday, May 18, 2015 4:00 PM<br>
<dd>To: Kevin Gifford
<<a href="mailto:Kevin.Gifford@colorado.edu">
Kevin.Gifford@colorado.edu</a>>, "Barkley, Erik J (3970)"
<<a href="mailto:erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">
erik.j.barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>, "Scott, Keith L."
<<a href="mailto:kscott@mitre.org">kscott@mitre.org</a>><br>
<dd>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<<a href="mailto:patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov">patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov</a>
>, "Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)"
<<a href="mailto:richard.j.barton@nasa.gov">
richard.j.barton@nasa.gov</a>>, Thomas Gannett
<<a href="mailto:tomg@aiaa.org">tomg@aiaa.org</a>>, Yuriy Sheynin
<<a href="mailto:sheynin@aanet.ru">sheynin@aanet.ru</a>><br>
<dd>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag
Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency
review<br><br>
<dd>Hi Kevin,<br><br>
<dd>I concur with the RID resolutions that you have applied to this
document. It is acceptable to me for this document to be released
for review.<br><br>
<dd>Best regards, Peter<br>
</dl></blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> <br>
<br>
<b>From: </b>Kevin K Gifford
<<a href="mailto:kevin.gifford@Colorado.EDU">
kevin.gifford@Colorado.EDU</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:15 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Peter Shames
<<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">
peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>, Erik Barkley
<<a href="mailto:Erik.J.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">
Erik.J.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>, Keith Scott
<<a href="mailto:kscott@mitre.org">kscott@mitre.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<<a href="mailto:patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov">patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov</a>
>, Richard Barton
<<a href="mailto:richard.j.barton@nasa.gov">
richard.j.barton@nasa.gov</a>>, Tom Gannett
<<a href="mailto:tomg@aiaa.org">tomg@aiaa.org</a>>, Yuriy Sheynin
<<a href="mailto:sheynin@aanet.ru">sheynin@aanet.ru</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag
Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
<br>
<dl>
<dd>Dear Peter, Erik, Keith – <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Thank you for your time and expertise in providing the review of the
SOIS Wireless WG RFID Tag-Encoding Red Book. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Attached please find two documents detailing the WWG's responses and
associated updates. The WWG concurred with all of the specific
comments. The attached spreadsheet lists the reviewer's (your)
critique and lists the WWG action to address the RID along with
indicating the specific document pages updated in the second attachment
which is a clean version of the document with all identified Review Items
dispositioned.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Please let me know if the changes meet with your approval or if you
have any remaining outstanding issues that need to be addressed.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Thanks again for your time in reviewing the SOIS Wireless WG RFID
Tag-Encoding Red Book. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Kevin<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>From: </b>Thomas Gannett
<<a href="mailto:tomg@aiaa.org">tomg@aiaa.org</a>><br>
<dd>Date: </b>Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:31 AM<br>
<dd>To: </b>Kevin Gifford
<<a href="mailto:gifford@rintintin.colorado.edu">
gifford@rintintin.colorado.edu</a>><br>
<dd>Cc: </b>"Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)"
<<a href="mailto:patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov">patrick.w.fink@nasa.gov</a>
>, "Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)"
<<a href="mailto:richard.j.barton@nasa.gov">
richard.j.barton@nasa.gov</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour@esa.int">
Jean-Francois.Dufour@esa.int</a>"
<<a href="mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour@esa.int">
Jean-Francois.Dufour@esa.int</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:peter.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">
peter.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>"
<<a href="mailto:peter.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">
peter.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:Erik.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">
Erik.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>"
<<a href="mailto:Erik.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov">
Erik.Barkley@jpl.nasa.gov</a>><br>
<dd>Subject: </b>Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to
release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag
Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Dear Kevin et al.:<br><br>
<dd>The CESG poll to approve release of the SOIS RFID Tag Red Book
concluded with conditions. The conditions are stated below--I have
attached the SEA AD's mark-up (881x1r0_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf).<br><br>
<dd>I have also attached the Word file (881x1r0_CESG_Approval.doc) used
to create the PDF file used in the poll. Please use it to make changes in
response to conditions.<br><br>
</u>
<dd>Resolution of the conditions should be negotiated directly with the
authors of the conditions (CCed) and reported back to the CESG.<br><br>
<dd>Best regards,<br>
<dd>Tom<br><br>
<br><br>
<dl>
<dd>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS
881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding
Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
<dd>Results of CESG poll beginning 29 March 2015 and ending 15 April
2015:<br><br>
<dd>
Abstain: 3 (37.5%) (Merri, Behal, Calzolari)<br>
<dd> Approve Unconditionally: 3 (37.5%) (Suess, Barton,
Scott)<br>
<dd> Approve with Conditions: 2 (25%) (Shames, Barkley)<br>
<dd> Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br><br>
<dd>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:<br><br>
<dd>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This document still needs
some work, particularly in the areas relating to the use of SANA and the
guidance to the SANA operator.<br><br>
<dd>The data structure is also probably more awkward than it needs to be,
but that appears to be a legacy limitation.<br><br>
<dd>please see the attached mark-up.<br><br>
<dd>Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): Condition 1: For this type of
recommendation an ICS should be stated to help ensure a good agency
review -- it will be useful to know what is mandatory and what is
optional in the ID (probably all of it but there is no direct statement
of that)<br><br>
<dd>Condition 2: it will be very helpful for agency reviews to know what
the policy is for assigning database IDs in SANA -- note that claiming
the SANA Registry as the administrator is insufficient as current CCSDS
practice is that the recommendation that defines a registry must,
necessarily, identify its management policy.<br><br>
<dd>Keith Scott (Approve Unconditionally): I'm willing to let this go
through to Agency Review, but the 'To Be Supplied' sections in the
document (PICS, Patent Considerations) are questionable. I think the CESG
should discuss whether such (admittedly slightly) incomplete documents
should be put out for Agency Review.<br><br>
<br>
<dd>Total Respondents: 8<br>
<dd>No response was received from the following Area(s):<br><br>
<dd>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with
Conditions<br>
<dd>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT
ACTION:
Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed<br><br>
</dl>
<dd>Thomas Gannett<br>
<dd>+1 443 472 0805 <br>
</blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
</dl>Thomas Gannett<br>
+1 443 472 0805</body>
</html>