[CESG] Action Item CMC-A-2014-04-05: Comments to startegic Plan, Roadmap, CWE, etc.

[Nestor.Peccia at esa.int]

Dear all,

the CMC has completed its action on commenting Strategic Plan, Roadmap, 
CWE, Juan's presentation, etc. etc.

You will find attached the files, but I extracted CNES that have comments 
per Area such that the ADs can start to prepare the responses. Please send 
them to me in order  to consolidate them.

ciao
nestor

SEA
SANA should be taken out of the RMP, consistently with the last change in 
the RMP.
Security: key management BB is behind schedule and should terminate 2017. 
Is this an issue for other WGs (e.g.: interdependency with SLS / SDLS)?
XML SIG is still a SIG while standards should be produced within 2 years: 
is there an issue as the WG(s) is (are) still to be created?
Only Security and DDOR are approved WGs/Projects; Timelines and XML SIG 
could / should start soon, while not yet present in the FW.
In this context, is it wise to authorize the new Architecture activities 
(goals 3 and 7) which, in the past have always suffered a lack of 
resources, in the proposed schedule?
How is the urgency justified? Where are the priorities?
Is there a risk to delay or interfere with one or the other of the 
approved / engaged activities?
Security and DDOR WGs have no activities identified as part of Future Plan 
beyond 2016. Should the groups be then?

MOIMS
NHM project appears twice, under SSA and NAV goals. 
NAV and DAI WGs have no activities identified as part of Future Plan 
beyond 2016. Should the groups be disbanded then?
Most of the MO services BB¡¦s in the CWE are not started and/or are behind 
schedule. What is the strategy proposed to progress these projects? Will 
the IOAG / MOSSG inputs on service priorities be considered to reschedule 
the parallel tasks

CSS
GFT is shown as part of CSS goals 2 and 4; to be fixed.
All activities in the FW are behind schedule for the CSTS WG. 
Nevertheless, this group still shows a long list of parallel activities to 
be conducted. What is the strategy proposed to progress these projects or,
preferably, to prioritize a few of them so that at least some CSTS 
standards may be proposed to users?
CSS CS-SM projects have target dates in the Strategic Plan, as part of the 
Future Plan. Nothing similar exists in the FW where status and target 
dates are blank. When will a tentative schedule be confirmed?

SOIS
Device virtualization is an existing MB. To be fixed.
Local Area Network WG shows a target date of 2015 in the Strategic Plan / 
RMP and end 2017 in the FW. Which one is valid?
Appl. Support WGs has no activities identified as part of Future Plan 
beyond 2015. Should the group be disbanded then?
The SOIS Area has only one WG (Wireless) and no activities identified as 
part of Future Plan beyond 2017. . Should the group be disbanded then? 
Should the group be disbanded earlier and the WG be re-allocated to 
another area (Wireless „Æ SLS?)?

SLS
All WGs have a schedule which minimize the parallel activities. 
Prioritization seems to be made upfront.
Data compression and SDLS WGs have no activities identified in the RMP as 
part of Future Plan beyond 2015 / 2016. However, the FW shows target dates 
beyond those (2017 / 2016). Then the question to disband or not those 
groups will become valid.
.
SIS
CFDP over encapsulation is no longer in the FW. To be fixed.
The FW reflects projects behind schedule and target dates quite earlier 
than those in the RMP/Strategic Plan. An alignment is required.
Contact graph and Bundle security projects have target dates in the 
RMP/Strategic Plan, as part of the Future Plan. Nothing similar exists in 
the FW where status and target dates are blank. When will a tentative 
schedule be confirmed?



ciao
nestor

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20140821/219ba5e0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCSDS_Strategic_Roadmap_140731 rev1.pptx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4692070 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20140821/219ba5e0/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CMC Response to AI CMC20140405.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 231776 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20140821/219ba5e0/attachment-0001.obj>