[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Thu Jan 16 16:46:43 EST 2014
Laura: The big problem you will still have to
deal with (kind of the reason for the detailed
reply) is the people who go to the Yellow Book
listing looking for CCSDS 313.0 and then complain
that it's not there because it's not where one
would expect to find it in the numerical sort.
(I'll refer anyone who complains to me to Peter.) --Tom
At 04:37 PM 1/16/2014, ccsds techsupport wrote:
>Tom,
>Thanks for your detailed reply, even though it
>was delayed (wish I could help); it was still very helpful.
>It appears we can close this action, and no further work is required.
>BTW - I have corrected the “italicized” header.
>Thanks,
>—Laura
>
>From: Thomas Gannett <<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>
>Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 at 4:06 PM
>To: Brian Oliver
><<mailto:ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>
>Cc:
>"<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int"
><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>,
>"<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org"
><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>
>Laura:
>
>The conditions and subsequent e-mail discussion
>reflect a great lot of confusion, and I don't
>know if there is an easy way to fix things or whether it is worth the trouble.
>
>The current sort appears to be simply by
>document number, with a heading beginning before
>the A--s indicating the books that follow are
>"management" documents. In fact, the numbering
>system reserves major topic "A" for management,
>but major topic "B" covers a broader category
>that includes meeting minutes and other types of
>books, so calling everything after the As in the
>sort "management documents" is not really
>correct. Moreover, when Bob Stephens reserved
>"A" for management, he meant "management
>council": the books currently numbered beginning
>with "A" are all books that were developed
>outside working groups and are basically
>management-council documents, although in the
>modern period ownership is shared with the CESG.
>
>Peter wanted his SANA book to fall in the
>"management" section, but he assumed it was a
>special section when in fact it is simply
>whatever books follow the heading that is
>inserted before the "A" series in the sort.
>
>I personally think the best approach is to leave
>things as they are but get rid of the
>"Management" and "Technical" headings (one of
>which is italicized and one of which isn't, by the way).
>
>Of the alternatives, 1) screwing around with the
>sort so that Peter's 3-- book ends up with the
>A-- books and the B-- book ends up with the
>1s-9s, or 2) renumbering Peter's book to begin
>with an "A" so that it naturally sorts with
>other "management" books (we would of course
>need to come up with other headings for the B,
>C, D, E, etc., series), I prefer 2. However,
>renumbering the book would require polling,
>that's a lot of trouble, and I'm not sure it's
>worth it; and the SANA Yellow Book was developed
>by the SANA WG, not the Management Council, so
>numbering it with an "A" violates the original
>intent of the "A" assignment, even if I'm the only one who remembers it.
>
>So you should be expected to be a little
>confused. I don't really think you should do
>anything until you get clear instruction, in any event.
>
>Tom
>
>At 03:20 PM 1/16/2014, ccsds techsupport wrote:
>>Content-Language: en-US
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="_000_CEFDA7C5151FFbrianoaiaaorg_"
>>
>>Tom,
>>Brian asked me to take a look into this, and I
>>must confess that I am a little confused.
>>After reviewing the e-mail chain below, it
>>appears that there is several actions. Can you confirm?
>><http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx>http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx
>>1) CCSDS 313.0-Y-1 - Move this book the the
>>“Management” Section on the Yellow Book page.
>>2) CCSDS B20.0-Y-2 - Move this book to the
>>“Technical” Section on the Yellow Book page.
>>3) Fix the PDF icons in the “Management” section. They appear to be missing.
>>Thanks,
>>—Laura
>>
>>From: Thomas Gannett
>><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at 3:00 PM
>>To: "Shames, Peter M (312G)"
>><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Barkley, Erik J
>>(3970)" <<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov> erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>Cc:
>>"<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
>>"
>><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>,
>>Brian Oliver
>><<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>,
>>"<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
>>" <<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org >
>>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>
>>Peter:
>>
>>Actually, what is going on on the Web site is
>>simply a sort by document number, with a label
>>identifying the Axx books as management
>>(according to our numbering scheme). I am sure
>>there was never any intention to organize books
>>in the list according to their content.
>>
>>I fully expect Brian to respond that trying to
>>make a 3xx appear at the bottom of the list
>>with the Axx books is going to screw up the
>>sort big time. If you think it's that
>>important, we should probably renumber the SANA YB to begin with A.
>>
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>At 02:45 PM 12/17/2013, Shames, Peter M (312G) wrote:
>>>Thanks. That'll fix it as far as I am
>>>concerned. And good catch on that other YB, I
>>>saw it but didn't want to go there.
>>>
>>>Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>From: Tom Gannett <<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>
>>>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:25 AM
>>>To: Erik Barkley
>>><<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>>Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, Peter Shames
>>><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>>Cc: Nestor Peccia
>>><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>,
>>>Brian Oliver
>>><<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>,
>>>CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec
>>><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org >
>>>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>>
>>>Peter:
>>>I am a long-time formality enthusiast, and I
>>>am as fond of bureaucracy as anyone, but I
>>>suspect all that was needed was for someone to
>>>advise Brian that it is a management book.
>>>It's probably my fault for not so categorizing it when I delivered it.
>>>
>>>Brian:
>>>While we're on the subject, CCSDS B20.0-Y-2 is not a management book.
>>>Tom
>>>At 02:00 PM 12/17/2013, Barkley, Erik J (3970) wrote:
>>>>Content-Language: en-US
>>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>>
>>>>boundary="_000_9785AD5923A1304EAB8166C9C686D15C692575C7apembxsp30RESAD_"
>>>>Peter,
>>>>
>>>>Thank you. It’s something of a mystery to
>>>>me as to why it was not originally
>>>>“classified” as a management book – ie put in
>>>>this section of the webpage for yellow
>>>>books. This clarifies the issue for me and I
>>>>no longer have a condition for the poll.
>>>>
>>>>-Erik
>>>>
>>>>From: Shames, Peter M (312G)
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:06 AM
>>>>To: Barkley, Erik J (3970)
>>>>Cc: Brian Oliver;
>>>><mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org;
>>>><mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
>>>>Subject: Re: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>>>
>>>>Erik,
>>>>
>>>>In regard the specific clause in the request
>>>>that the SANA Yellow Book, CCSDS 313.0-Y-1
>>>>(issued July 2011), "be re-classified as a
>>>>CCSDS Management Publication", what I was
>>>>asking was that it be given the same status
>>>>as the other Yellow Books that are treated as
>>>>CCSDS Management Publications, such as the
>>>>Organization and Processes for the
>>>>Consultative Committee for Space Data
>>>>Systems. CCSDS A02.1-Y-3 , July 2011 or the
>>>>CCSDS Publications Manual. CCSDS A20.0-Y-3, December 2011.
>>>>
>>>>We have many Yellow Books, but many of them
>>>>are just test reports. These are all listed
>>>>in the "Technical Yellow Books" section of
>>>>the CCSDS web site located at
>>>><http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx>http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx.
>>>>What I am specifically requesting is that the
>>>>SANA YB be moved into the section of this
>>>>CCSDS Yellow Book page that is titled
>>>>"Management Yellow Books". This is where the
>>>>Org & Proc and Pubs manuals are located. No
>>>>other changes are necessary, but this does
>>>>signal the official "management book" status of the SANA YB.
>>>>
>>>>Is that acceptable?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>From: Nestor Peccia <<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int >
>>>>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:11 AM
>>>>To: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG
>>>>Exec <<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org >
>>>>Cc: Brian Oliver <<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>
>>>>Subject: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>>>
>>>>Peter
>>>>Are you aware of Erik's condition to the poll ?
>>>>The website can only be updated once the condition is solved.
>>>>ciao
>>>>nestor
>>>>=========================================
>>>>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2013-11-002
>>>>Changes to the CCSDS Website Regarding SANA
>>>>Results of CESG poll beginning 14 November
>>>>2013 and ending 28 November 2013:
>>>>Abstain: 0 (0%)
>>>>Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83%) (Peccia,
>>>>Taylor, Calzolari, Shames, Scott)
>>>>Approve with Conditions: 1 (17%) (Barkley)
>>>>Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
>>>>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>>>>Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Please clarify what is meant by
>>>>"a CCSDS Management Publication².
>>>>I assume by "SANA YB", the resolution is referring to CCSDS 313.0-Y-1
>>>>(issued July 2011) ? If so,
>>>>is this not already a procedure manual for SANA and as such is this not
>>>>already a "Management Publication" ?
>>>>I agree with the intent of the poll, but I want to be clear as to what
>>>>re-classification implies.
>>>>Total Respondents: 6
>>>>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>>>>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
>>>>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Update website after conditions
>>>>are met
>>>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>their
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Please consider the environment before printing this
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>email.
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>CESG mailing list
>>>><mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
>>>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Secretariat mailing list
>>>><mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
>>>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
>>>Thomas Gannett
>>>+1 443 472 0805
>>_______________________________________________
>>CESG mailing list
>><mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Secretariat mailing list
>><mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20140116/b220f281/attachment.htm
More information about the CESG
mailing list