[CESG] CESG Fall 13 Report to CMC

[Shames, Peter M (312G)]

Ciao Nestor,

Thank you for dealing with these issues.  My only remaining concern is that the text you provided, from the CESG internal report, still says this:

SLS AD/DAD state that they would rather have a BB than an OB, as this would be a more harmonized CCSDS work item capable of having consensus also by opposing agencies.
SLS AD/DAD will remove the conflicting issue from the CMC report if the proposing agencies will agree to these terms and remove OB project from framework, First thing to do is a concept document concentrating on:

If our intent is to honor the spirit of the agreement then this should probably be stated like this for the CMC:

SLS AD/DAD state that they would rather have a BB than an OB, as this would be a more harmonized CCSDS work item capable of having consensus by all agencies.
SLS AD/DAD agree to creating a Green Book and future Blue Book in the framework and request that the first thing is to create a Concept Paper concentrating on:

Cheers, Peter


From: Nestor Peccia <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>>
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:01 AM
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: [CESG] CESG Fall 13 Report to CMC

Peter,

Editorials have been corrected in my version 1.2, because I have already received comments from the CMC.

wrt SLS issue, I must admit that I made a mistake by inserting automatically all reports and not detecting that the CESG discussion / agreement was missing.

Gippo is on holidays. He returns on Thursday, but I will be in ASI (Rome) the whole day. I will discuss with him on Friday.

I suggest to add a VG addressing what was discussed during the CESG meeting (remediating the Area problem, and showing the CESG "consensus"), and in-line with the CESG notes distributed to all WGs:
===================================================
New Project to create a common data link layer protocol (Gippo, G. Moury)
After a lengthy discussion, CESG has decided that the WG can go ahead with the proposal and pursue this item only after consensus on requirements is reached .
WG is requested to send concept paper to other WG, and have discussions with them for closure, before initiating a Blue Book project. The WG is encouraged to do this as soon as they can, before and during the next two working meetings.
SLS AD/DAD state that they would rather have a BB than an OB, as this would be a more harmonized CCSDS work item capable of having consensus also by opposing agencies.
SLS AD/DAD will remove the conflicting issue from the CMC report if the proposing agencies will agree to these terms and remove OB project from framework, First thing to do is a concept document concentrating on
•        Requirements of prospective missions
•        Return on experience (identified deficiencies, limitations, flaws of existing CCSDS protocols)
•        Clear statement of expected benefits from next generation space link protocol
•        Description of the key features of what is being proposed
===================================================

ciao
nestor


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20131126/179b83bb/attachment.htm