[CESG] Proc YB options

[Barkley, Erik J (3970)]

Nestor,

I am okay with option B.  I do believe that as CCSDS has grown and become more technically complex, that a discussion on the definition of consensus is appropriate.

Best regards,

-Erik

From: cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:01 PM
To: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [CESG] Proc YB options

Dear all,

I received only some responses about the way forward

I repeat the options with a clarification for Option B

  *   Option A: YBs is not delivered to the CMC. CESG will discuss the consensus definition during the next CESG webex on 18th Nov 2013
  *   Option B: We send the YBs as issued by Tom (including the received editorial corrections) to the CMC. CESG will discuss the consensus definition during the next CESG webex on 18th Nov 2013

There is no guarantee that we can reach an agreement during our first discussion, and the subh=ject needs to be discussed in the next webex during 2014 (e.g. end Jan and beginning March 2014)

ciao
nestor

  *

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20131115/30b42866/attachment-0001.html