[CESG] Action CMC-A-2012-04-07 / CFDP evolution

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

> 
> Keith, I have some problems with point C on CFDP. We will be using CFDP 
on
> many of our future missions, we therefore need a stable and active CFDP
> standard covering class 1 and class 2 on point on point links, possibly 
with
> SFO for relay. I have no problem evolving CFDP to have a subset to 
operate
> with DTN (class 1 +) but we need to maintain the existing CFDP class 1/2
> capabilities.
> 
> Regards,
> //ct

I do concur with Chris.
Backward compatibility shall be preserved as much as possible to avoid 
undermining CCSDS adoption policy and popularity.
Therefore I would reword item "c" to show an envisaged enrichment of the 
CFDP capabilities.

Best regards

Gian Paolo

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130125/3569f286/attachment.html