[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?

[Nestor.Peccia at esa.int]

Keith
It is OK
In the future there will be no more instructions, but an agreed process to follow
- cristal
- clear
- transparent
Ciao
Nestor

Sent from my iPhone

On 19.02.2013, at 18:20, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org> wrote:

> Nestor,
>  
> I apologize that you weren’t copied on the resolution to publish the SSI Architecture – I neglected to copy any of the CESG (the resolution went out before the Fall meetings where I was instructed to do so).
>  
> I do think that this case, while not a *good* example of the process, should end up producing a stronger CCSDS product that is fully endorsed by the Space Internetworking Strategy Group to the IOAG.
>  
> v/r,
>  
>                         --keith
>  
>  
> Dr. Keith Scott                                                                                           Office: +1.703.983.6547
> Principal Engineer, E535                                                                        kscott at mitre.org
> The MITRE Corporation
> M/S H300
> 7515 Colshire Drive
> McLean, VA 22102
>  
> Area Director, CCSDS Space Internetworking Services
>  
> MITRE self-signs its own certificates.  Information about the MITRE PKI Certificate Chain is available from http://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/
>  
>  
>  
> From: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int [mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:27 PM
> To: Thomas Gannett
> Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; John.j.rush at nasa.gov; Scott, Keith L.; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org; Thomas Gannett
> Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
>  
> Tom 
> OK 
> I misunderstood the book (SSI GB vs CSA GB) 
> 
> but this in not the main issue 
> 
> Was I copied in the resolution request ? 
> 
> I can not find Keith's mail with the resolution. 
> 
> If I am wrong, please disregard my statements 
> 
> Otherwise, we need to discuss this type of hand-shake resolutions between ADs and the Secretariat. 
> 
> This is not the type of governance that we need, considering that for other matters everybody is pushing us for the appliance of the Procedure YB to its letter. 
> 
> ciao 
> nestor
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>  
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> _______________________________________________
> CESG mailing list
> CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130219/25a0540d/attachment.htm