[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?

Tue Feb 19 10:12:23 EST 2013

I believe we need to review the CESG poll governance
If the SIS and SLS ADs can govern a poll submitted by the CSS AD
Something is going wrong
Ciao
Nestor
Sent from my iPhone

On 19.02.2013, at 15:06, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org> wrote:

> Tom,
>  
> Thank you and my apologies for not getting to you sooner.  The initial reconstituted SISG meeting was last Thursday.
>  
> Tom: I concur with your recommendation; please withdraw the CESG poll for the SSI Architecture Document.  Can you please send me a copy of the document so that I can provide it to the SISG?  (it seems to have already disappeared off the CESG polls page…)
>  
> Gian Paolo: You are of course correct in that the CESG review copy should be distributed to the SISG.
>  
>                         --keith
>  
>  
> From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:00 AM
> To: Thomas Gannett
> Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; John.j.rush at nasa.gov; Scott, Keith L.; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
> Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
>  
> Tom,        I do concur with your proposal. 
> Keith,        I would propose distributing to SISG the CESG approval version as this is anyhow the closest to an ec=ventual publication. 
> Regards 
> Gian Paolo 
> 
> 
> From:
> Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org>
> To:
> "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>, "Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
> Cc:
> "cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org" <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Burleigh, Scott C (313B)" <scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org" <Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>, "John.j.rush at nasa.gov" <John.j.rush at nasa.gov>, "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec        (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org)" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
> Date:
> 19/02/2013 15:56
> Subject:
> Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for  SSI?
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Keith:
> 
> I was not aware that there was a "parallel" review going on; and since I had to reorganize some of the material in the book for conformance with CCSDS style, the CESG approval version differs from the version under SISG review.  I think the appropriate thing to do is to withdraw the CESG poll and wait until a final version of the document is delivered to the Secretariat before starting another CESG poll.  Doing so will almost certainly delay CCSDS publication until after the spring meetings, however.
> 
> Tom
> 
> At 09:28 AM 2/19/2013, Scott, Keith L. wrote:
> 
> I thought of that (or, preferable from *my* point of view, “Approve with Conditions” with the conditions being to resolve issues with the SISG).   J
> 
>                        --keith
> 
> From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [ mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:15 AM
> To: Scott, Keith L.
> Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; John.j.rush at nasa.gov; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
> Subject: Re: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
> 
> Keith, 
>        I do support your request and I would be in favor of canceling the current poll and restarting it after the SISG comments are finalized. 
> If needed we can simply DISAPPROVE WITH COMMENT   this poll with the same effects  :o) 
> 
> Best regards 
> 
> Gian Paolo 
> 
> From: 
> "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org> 
> To: 
> " Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org" < Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org> 
> Cc: 
> "Burleigh, Scott C \(313B\)" < scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>, "John.j.rush at nasa.gov " <John.j.rush at nasa.gov>, "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec        \(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\ )" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org > 
> Date: 
> 19/02/2013 14:01 
> Subject: 
> [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI? 
> Sent by: 
> cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Secretariat, 
>  
> The SSI Architecture Green Book is a deliverable to the IOAG and is currently being reviewed by the revived Space Internetworking Strategy Group (SISG) review team. 
>  
> Can we reschedule (or maybe just extend) the polling period on the SSI Architecture Green Book until the SISG review has had a chance to comment on the document?  This would allow for any comments to be incorporated as part of the CESG review process.  In practice, the SISG will have reviewed the document by mid-March, so an SSI Architecture poll that ends at the end of March (i.e. delay or extend by about a month) would be useful. 
>  
>                        --keith 
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. Keith Scott                                                                                           Office: +1.703.983.6547 
> Principal Engineer, E535                                                                        kscott at mitre.org 
> The MITRE Corporation 
> M/S H300 
> 7515 Colshire Drive 
> McLean, VA 22102 
>  
> Area Director, CCSDS Space Internetworking Services 
>  
> MITRE self-signs its own certificates.  Information about the MITRE PKI Certificate Chain is available from http://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/ 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CESG mailing list
> CESG at mailman.ccsds.org 
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
> addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
> dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is
> not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the
> sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their
> integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this
> email. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Secretariat mailing list
> Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
> Thomas Gannett
> +1 443 472 0805
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>  
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> _______________________________________________
> CESG mailing list
> CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130219/1f270bdb/attachment.html