[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 19 February 2021

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-02-002 Approval to release CCSDS 
132.0-P-2.1, TM Space Data Link Protocol (Proposed Pink Sheets, Issue 
2.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 7 February 2021 and ending 19 February 2021:

                 Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally:  3 (75%) 
(Burleigh, Calzolari, He)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (25%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  Please explain why sec 
4.1.2.2.3 SCID was changed.  For what reason was the reference to the 
SCID being ssigned to the S/C, and being fixed for all time, removed 
from the spec?


Total Respondents:  4

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     MOIMS
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-02-003 Approval to release CCSDS 
232.0-P-3.1, TC Space Data Link Protocol (Proposed Pink Sheets, Issue 
3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 7 February 2021 and ending 19 February 2021:

                 Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally:  3 (75%) 
(Burleigh, Calzolari, He)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (25%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  I am a little concerned 
that the removal of the "two ports per SAP" language that first 
appears in sec 2.2.2.1, and then elsewhere in the doc, may present a 
"backward compatibility" issue for implementors of the current 
standard.  Is there any guarantee that this will not be n issue?


Total Respondents:  4

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     MOIMS
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-02-004 Approval to release CCSDS 
732.0-P-3.1, AOS Space Data Link Protocol (Proposed Pink Sheets, 
Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 7 February 2021 and ending 19 February 2021:

                 Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally:  3 (75%) 
(Burleigh, Calzolari, He)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (25%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  There is some 
confusing, and apparently innaccurate, wording vis-a-vis Insert zones 
in Sec 3.2.6 and sec 4.2.7.2.  See attached file with mark-ups.


Total Respondents:  4

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     MOIMS
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-02-005 Approval to release CCSDS 
732.1-P-1.1, Unified Space Data Link Protocol (Proposed Pink Sheets, 
Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 7 February 2021 and ending 19 February 2021:

                 Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve Unconditionally:  3 (75%) 
(Burleigh, Calzolari, He)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (25%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  There are a few issues, 
as identified in sec 2.1.2.4, sec 4.1.1, and sec 4.1.2.1 in the 
attached, that need to be remedied.  Otherise the changes are an 
improvement in clarity of the document, in particular handling of 
truncated frames.


Total Respondents:  4

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     MOIMS
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *